Back
D. RAMESH
V. Satish – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed seeking for the following relief:-
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was directly recruited Civil Sub Inspector of 2008 batch, Eluru range and presently working as Sub-Inspector of Police at Gampalagudem Police Station, Nuzvid Su
The petitioner was entitled to notional seniority on par with the 2008 batch of Sub-Inspectors of Police based on previous orders of the Tribunal and the High Court, as well as a Supreme Court preced....
The court established that supplementary examination marks must be included in seniority calculations for candidates who completed their training within the prescribed period.
The petitioners were entitled to the benefit of FR 22-B, and the respondent authorities were directed to re-fix the scale of pay of the petitioners by giving them the benefit of FR 22-B.
Point of Law : In direct recruitment whose appointments have delayed without any fault on part of candidates, but due to latches on the part of the department, candidate is entitled to be ranking giv....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to direct the second respondent to pass necessary orders for the fixation of correct seniority on par with S. Shanmugam in th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
