Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Aravalli Visalakshmi W/o Subba Rao – Appellant
Versus
Pratha Lakshmi Narasimham S/o Late Suryanarayana Murthy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. Sri K.A. Narashimham, learned counsel for the appellant represented that the present matter was settled out of the Court long back in between both the parties and he further represented that the appeal has become “infructuous.”
2. The representation made by the learned counsel for the appellant is recorded.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Settlement of a matter out of court can render an appeal infructuous and lead to its dismissal.
Settlement of the matter between the parties can render an appeal infructuous, leading to its dismissal by the court.
Settlement between parties rendering an appeal infructuous leads to its dismissal.
Dismissal of appeal for default
An appeal deemed infructuous lacks merit and is therefore dismissed by the court.
An appeal may be dismissed as infructuous when the circumstances render it impossible to proceed.
An appeal may be dismissed as infructuous if it no longer presents a live issue for determination.
An appeal may be closed as infructuous where the appellant acknowledges that the subject matter or grounds for the appeal no longer survive for judicial determination.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants do not appear for the hearing.
An appeal is dismissed as infructuous when the subject matter no longer requires adjudication.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
