SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 45

VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
K. Krishnaiah S/o Subbaiah – Appellant
Versus
Tiruvakkadu R. L. Mani D/o T. R. Lakshmiparthi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M. Chalapati Rao.
For the Respondent: R.V. Subba Rao.

JUDGMENT :

VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.

1. Learned counsel for the appellants represented that the matter was settled out of the Court in between both the parties and he further represented that the appeal may be “infructuous.”

2. The representation made by the learned counsel for the appellants is recorded.

3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top