Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Goru Dayanandarao S/o Devadatham – Appellant
Versus
Katneni Venkata Krishnayya (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents is present and reported ready. Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal” there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It seems that the appellants are not inclined to prosecute the appeal.
2. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
3. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants do not appear for the hearing.
Non-prosecution of the appeal led to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal
Dismissal for non-prosecution when there is no representation on both sides
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and shows no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Dismissal of appeal for default
Dismissal for default due to failure to respond to notices.
Settlement of the matter between the parties can render an appeal infructuous, leading to its dismissal by the court.
Non-appearance and lack of inclination to prosecute the appeal can lead to dismissal of the suit.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
