Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Malla Satyanarayana S/o Late Durgu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Lanka Venkata Ramanamma W/o Late Venkateswarlu Garu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. When these matters was listed on 31.01.2024, there was no representation on both sides and the matters were posted to 06.02.2024, under the caption “For Dismissal.”
2. Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, there is no representation on both sides, it seems that the appellants are not inclined to prosecute the appeals.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suits are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Dismissal for non-prosecution when there is no representation on both sides
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants do not appear for the hearing.
Non-prosecution of the appeal led to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal
Dismissal of appeal for default
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and shows no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Dismissal for default due to failure to respond to notices.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
Abatement of appeal due to the death of the sole appellant and the inaction of the legal representatives.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
