Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
R. Chintala Bhaskara Rao S/o Seetharamaiah – Appellant
Versus
T. Annapurnamma, Brahmin Students Home Trust – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. Learned counsel for the appellant appeared through virtual hearing and represented that the sole appellant died at about five (5) years ago, till now no steps are taken and his Legal Representatives are not interested to prosecute the appeal and he further represented that necessary orders may be passed. The same is recorded.
2. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
3. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Abatement of appeal due to the death of the sole appellant and the inaction of the legal representatives.
Dismissal of appeal for default
Non-prosecution of the appeal led to its dismissal.
Dismissal for default due to failure to respond to notices.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal
Settlement of the matter between the parties can render an appeal infructuous, leading to its dismissal by the court.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants do not appear for the hearing.
Dismissal for non-prosecution when there is no representation on both sides
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and shows no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
