Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Doguparthy Vijay Kumar S/o D. Gowri Subramanyam – Appellant
Versus
Doguparthy Seshu Kumar S/o Gowri Subramanayam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. Today, when the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It seems that the appellants are not inclined to prosecute the appeal.
2. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
3. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Non-prosecution of the appeal led to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants do not appear for the hearing.
Dismissal for non-prosecution when there is no representation on both sides
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and shows no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Dismissal of appeal for default
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear for the hearing and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
Abatement of appeal due to the death of the sole appellant and the inaction of the legal representatives.
Dismissal for default due to failure to respond to notices.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
