Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
C. Bala Bhaskar S/o. Sri Krishna Murthy – Appellant
Versus
C. Sudhakar S/o. Krishna Murthy – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
1. When the matter was listed on 30.01.2024, learned counsel for the respondents was alone present and there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and the matter was posted to 02.02.2024, under the caption “For Dismissal”.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents is virtually present. It seems that the appellant is no inclined to prosecute the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by appearing for the hearing may lead to dismissal of the appeal suit.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear for the hearing and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by not being represented in court can lead to dismissal.
Non-appearance and lack of inclination to prosecute the appeal can lead to dismissal of the suit.
Non-prosecution of an appeal may lead to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution due to lack of representation can lead to dismissal of an appeal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
