Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Vootukuri Durga Prasad S/o Nagesara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Vootukuri Venkatamma W/o Nageswara Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. Learned counsel for the appellant represented that on the earlier occasion notice was sent to the appellant by the Registry and the same was served.
2. Today, when the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal.
3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and shows no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal
Non-prosecution of the appeal led to its dismissal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants do not appear for the hearing.
Dismissal for non-prosecution when there is no representation on both sides
Dismissal for default due to failure to respond to notices.
Dismissal of appeal for default
Abatement of appeal due to the death of the sole appellant and the inaction of the legal representatives.
Settlement of the matter between the parties can render an appeal infructuous, leading to its dismissal by the court.
The court's decision to dismiss the appeal upon the appellant's request for withdrawal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
