SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 134

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
Vootukuri Durga Prasad S/o Nagesara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Vootukuri Venkatamma W/o Nageswara Rao – Respondent
First Appeal No. 670 of 2005
Decided On : 12-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : T.S. Anand.
For the Respondents: M.V.S. Suresh Kumar.

The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and shows no inclination to prosecute the appeal.

Headnote:

Dismissal for Non-Prosecution - Appellate Procedure - The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear, indicating a lack of inclination to prosecute the appeal.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was noticed by the Registry for the appeal, but failed to appear when the matter was listed for dismissal.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and concluded that the appellant was not inclined to prosecute the appeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution.

Issues: Non-appearance of the appellant, inclination to prosecute the appeal

Ratio Decidendi: The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and shows no inclination to prosecute the appeal.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs, and any pending miscellaneous petitions were closed as a result.

JUDGMENT :

VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.

1. Learned counsel for the appellant represented that on the earlier occasion notice was sent to the appellant by the Registry and the same was served.

2. Today, when the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal.

3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top