JUDGMENT

SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J. - The above writ petition is filed by two registered Societies to direct the respondents to pay the yearly annuity amounts as per the bills submitted by 5th respondent and to pay interest @24% per annum on the delayed payment of annuity and damages and other appropriate orders.

2. The writ petition was numbered and thereafter listed before the Court in the caption of Admission.

3. The 8th respondent is impleaded as a party to the writ petition as per the order in I.A.No.2 of 2023 dtd. 16/10/2023.

4. Sri Kasa Jaganmohan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 4, 5 and 7 filed objections regarding the maintainability of the writ petition and prayed the Court, to decide the maintainability of the writ petition. Learned counsel for 8th respondent also raised objections regarding maintainability of the writ petition.

5. The objections raised regarding maintainability of writ petition are that -

(a) Writ petition is filed in representative capacity under Order I Rule 8 of CPC on behalf of members of two Societies and the list of members is not filed.

(b) Leave was not sought from the Court as required under Order I Rule 8 of CPC.

(c) G.O.Ms.No.75 Mun