IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Ravi Nath Tilhari, V.Srinivas, JJ.
Sandrapati Vijaya Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 35726, 37037 of 2018
Decided On : 27-09-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. merit based selection for reserved categories. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 2. issues of merit and category under appointment procedures. (Para 12) |
| 3. arguments for merit-based adjustments. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. local candidates and reservation rules. (Para 23 , 24 , 26 , 47 , 49) |
| 5. judicial precedents affirming merit principle. (Para 28 , 29 , 40) |
| 6. law regarding selection based on merit and the effect on reservation. (Para 34) |
| 7. court's directive on implementation of selection rules. (Para 41 , 44 , 78) |
| 8. final ruling on candidates' appointments. (Para 46 , 76 , 77) |
JUDGMENT
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J. - Heard Sri N. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.35726 of 2018 and Sri S. Satyanarayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, in W.P.No.37037 of 2018. Smt Sumathi, learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare Department and Sri T. Balakrishna, learned standing counsel for Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, (in short, APPSC) in both the writ petitions.
2. In W.P.No.35726 of 2018 the memo of proof of service on the unofficial respondents 4 to 9 open competition category, selected candidates, securing lesser marks than the petitioners was filed. But, there is no representation for those respondents.
3. Both the writ petitions involve common question of law and are being decided by the common judgment. FACTS IN W.P.No.35726 OF 2018 - (PETITIONER S. VIJAY KUMAR):
4. The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission (in short, -APPSC?) issued notification No.55/2011 dtd. 28/12/2011 to fill up 57 posts of Hostel Welfare Officers, Grade-II (Group-IV) in Social Welfare and Tribal Welfare Department in Krishna District.
5. Three (3) posts out of 57 were reserved for Scheduled Caste candidates (S.Cs). The petitioner S. Vijaya Kumar applied and secured 203 marks (46th rank). He appeared for verification of the original documents on 19/6/2013, but in the final selection list, his name did not find place.
6. One candidate in this reserved category, namely N. Chandra Mohan (SC) secured 216 marks (12th rank).
7. The last selected candidate in General/Open Competition Category (OC) G. Pulla Reddy secured 211 marks (21st rank).
8. The petitioner stood at Sl.No.4 in the merit of SC candidate. The other two SC posts were filled by the candidates namely E. Maheswar Rao securing 210 marks (25th Rank), and G. Abbulu securing 204 marks (44th rank).
9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that N. Chandra Mohan (SC) on his merit should have been selected and shifted to post in O.C. The petitioner then would have been selected based on his marks in S.C category.
10. The petitioner filed O.A.No.106 of 2016 which was dismissed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad (for short, -the Tribunal?) on 20/9/2018.
11. This petitioner has filed W.P.No.35726 of 2018 with the following prayer:-
-..........to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari by calling for records in O.A.No.106 of 2016 and declare the same as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the order passed by the Hon'ble A.P.A.T in O.A.No.106 of 2016 dtd. 10/9/2018 and direct respondents 1 to 3 to select the petitioner in the post of Hostel Welfare Officer Grade-II in SC category as per notification No.55/2011 dtd. 28/12/2011 and to pass such other orders.?
FACTS IN W.P.No.37037 OF 2018 (PETITIONER ASURI SRINIVASA RAO):
12. Pursuant to the same notification, the petitioner of W.P.No.37037 of 2018 Asuri Srinivasa Rao, applied under the reserved category of B.C-D. Out of 57 posts, 3 were reserved for B.C-D. The petitioner secured 201 marks and was at Sl.No.4 of the merit of B.C-D.
13. In this reserved category one candidate namely Gollapally Srinivasa Rao (BC-D) secured 216 marks (13th) rank.
14. As aforesaid the last selected candidate in O.C, G. Pulla Reddy secured 211 marks.
15. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the other two B.C-D selected
Pradeep Singh Dehal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others.
Saurav Yadav and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and another vs. Sandeep Choudhary and Another
Pradeep Singh Dehal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others
Vikas Sankhala v. Vikas Kumar Agarwal
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
R.K. Sabharwal [R.K. Sabharwal v. State of Punjab
Anil Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P.
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
R.K. Sabharwal v. State of Punjab
Union of India v. Virpal Singh Chauhan
Uttaranchal Public Service Commission Vs. Mamta Bisht
Union of India v. Virpal Singh Chauhan, (1995) 6 SCC 684
Saurav Yadav Vs. State of U.P.
Sadhana Singh Dangi Vs. Pinki Asati
Dr.C. Surekha vs. Union of India and Others
AI
Reserved category candidates with higher merit than general candidates are entitled to selection in open categories without impacting their quotas, maintaining the integrity of reservation principles....
The court affirmed that horizontal reservation must be applied correctly, ensuring merit-based selection without exceeding prescribed quotas, and upheld the applicant's claim for appointment due to i....
Candidates securing higher marks than unreserved category cannot claim reservation benefits unless explicitly provided by state policy; constitutional provisions require formal policy to confer reser....
It is well-established that an authority cannot make any selection/appointment beyond the number of posts advertised, even if there were a larger number of posts available than those advertised.
Reservation policies in public employment must prioritize merit; candidates from reserved categories who qualify for general positions based on merit are to be treated as general category candidates.
Candidates from reserved categories, if selected on the basis of their own merit, cannot be counted against the quota for their vertical reservation categories. The application of horizontal reservat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.