Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J.
S. Abdul Munaf S/o Sheik Saheb – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 7009, 7928, 7929, 7938, 9838, 10460, 10525 of 2024
Decided On : 07-05-2024
Writ Petition - Co-operation - The court allowed the writ petitions based on a common judgment previously rendered, indicating adherence to established legal precedents and ensuring consistency in judicial decisions.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitions were filed by Sri B. Raghava Reddy, Sri Srinivas Basava, and Sri Ch. L. Narasimha Rao, represented by their respective counsels, challenging certain actions related to co-operation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the cases were covered by a common judgment delivered on 06.05.2024 in W.P. No. 3255 of 2023, thus allowing the writ petitions in accordance with that judgment.
Issues: Whether the writ petitions were justified based on the common judgment previously rendered by the court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of consistency in judicial decisions and the binding nature of prior judgments on similar issues.
Result: The writ petitions were allowed, and the registry was directed to attach the copy of the common order from W.P. No. 3255 of 2023.
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri V. Sri Sai Harsha, learned Counsel representing Sri B. Raghava Reddy, Sri Srinivas Basava and Sri Ch. L. Narasimha Rao, respective learned Counsels for the Writ Petitioners and Sri P. Vara Prasad, learned Government Pleader for Co-operation.
2. These cases are squarely covered by the Common Judgment rendered by learned single Judge of this Court on 06.05.2024 in W.P. No. 3255 of 2023 and batch.
3. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions stand allowed in terms of the common Judgment passed by this Court on 06.05.2024 in W.P. No. 3255 of 2023 and batch. Registry is directed to attach the copy of the Common Order in W.P. No. 3255 of 2023 dated 06.05.2024, along with this Order.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of in terms of this Order.
The principle of adhering to established judicial precedents in the interest of consistency and fairness in legal proceedings.
The necessity of providing supporting documentation in writ petitions to substantiate claims made against respondent societies.
Interim orders passed without hearing the affected party violate natural justice and are liable to be set aside with remand for fresh adjudication after opportunity to all parties.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
