Back
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
S. Abdul Munaf S/o Sheik Saheb – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri V. Sri Sai Harsha, learned Counsel representing Sri B. Raghava Reddy, Sri Srinivas Basava and Sri Ch. L. Narasimha Rao, respective learned Counsels for the Writ Petitioners and Sri P. Vara Prasad, learned Government Pleader for Co-operation.
2. These cases are squarely covered by the Common Judgment rendered by learned single Judge of this Court on 06.05.2024 in W.P. No. 3255 of 2023 and batch.
3. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions stand allowed in terms of the common Judgment passed by this Court on 06.05.2024 in W.P. No. 3255 of 2023 and batch. Registry is directed to attach the copy of the Common Order in W.P. No. 3255 of 2023 dated 06.05.2024, along with this Order.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of in terms of this Order.
The principle of adhering to established judicial precedents in the interest of consistency and fairness in legal proceedings.
The necessity of providing supporting documentation in writ petitions to substantiate claims made against respondent societies.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
