Gaddipati Bullemma W/o Mohana Rao vs Thota Venkayamma (Died)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Satyanarayana Nimmala.
For the Respondent: K.V. Subramanya Narsu.

JUDGMENT :

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J.

Heading	Para Nos. within the judgment
FACTUAL BACKGROUND	1-8
PROCEDURAL HISTORY IN O.S. No. 117/1994
• Pleadings of the Parties	9
• Issues Framed	10
• Evidence Recorded	11-12
• Findings of the Trial Court	13-14
PROCEDURAL HISTORY IN E.A. No. 144 of 1998
• Pleadings in E.A. No. 144 of 1998	15
• Points framed	16
• Findings of the Court	17
GROUNDS OF APPEAL
• In the A.S.	20
• In the C.M.A.	21
ARGUMENTS ADVANCED AT THE BAR
• By the Appellant’s Counsel	22
• By the Respondent’s Counsel	23
POINTS FOR DETERMINATION
• Duty of the Appellate Court	24-27
• Points Framed	28
DETERMINATION BY THE COURT
• Previous Rounds of Litigation	29-34
• Doctrine of Res Judicata & Application	38-76
• Adverse Possession & Application	77-85
• Limitation for filing a Suit for Declaration of title	86-89
• Order XXI Rule 64 of the Code & Application	90-99