SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Indus Gene Expressions Limited, Rep. By its authorized signatory, Rachamalla Jagan Mohan Reddy, S/o R. Siva Shankar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Revenue (Registration & Stamps) Department – Respondent
ORDER :
(Subba Reddy Satti, J.)
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
2. The averments in the affidavit, in brief, are that petitioner’s vendors namely Vaddi Venkata Ramudu, Vaddi Adhi Lakshmamma and Vaddi Saraswathi are the absolute owners of the land of an extent of Ac.0-95 cents i
Land Acquisition Officer Cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division vs. Mekala Pandu
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Nandlal Jaiswal
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others v. T.T.Murali Babu
Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable if effective statutory remedies are available and not pursued, especially in cases of delay.
The doctrine of res judicata applies to writ petitions, preventing re-litigation of issues already decided, thereby ensuring finality in judicial decisions.
A Sub-Registrar cannot refuse registration of a deed based on questions of title or procedural delays in payment of stamp duty, as these are outside their jurisdiction.
Registering authorities must register documents presented if procedural requirements are satisfied, regardless of ownership disputes, ensuring compliance with the Registration Act and securing justic....
A petitioner must comply with statutory requirements for document registration, and failure to provide evidence of proper presentation can lead to dismissal of the writ petition.
Prohibition for assignment of these lands under the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 is not attracted to the said land since the alienations were made by the ex-servicemen more....
Assigned lands lose their status when sold in execution proceedings, allowing for registration without objection.
The Registering Authority cannot refuse to register a sale deed based on title disputes; procedural compliance is sufficient for registration under the Registration Act.
The Sub-Registrar must register documents presented for registration unless legally prohibited, following the Registration Act's provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the refusal for registration of properties based on defective notifications under Section 22-A of the Registration Act was illegal, arbitrary,....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.