SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1403

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Nandyala Shaik Saleem – Appellant
Versus
State of AP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. Mohan Rami Reddy.
For the Respondents:The Advocate General.

ORDER :

(Kiranmayee Mandava, J.)

1. This Writ Petition is filed for issuance of Habeas Corpus by directing the 4th respondent to produce the detenue and set him at liberty by declaring the proceedings of the 2nd respondent, in detaining Smt. Khairun Bee, W/o. Abdul Gafoor, vide order dated 20-06-2023 in Rc.No.Cl/513/M/2023, as confirmed by the 1st respondent in G.O.Rt.No.1675 dated 21.08.2023, as illegal and unconstitutional.

2. The petitioner is the brother of the detenue. He contends that the the 2nd respondent vide proceedings dated 20-06-2023, passed an order of detention under Sec.3(1) read with Sec.2(f) of the A.P Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers and Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986, (for short "Act No.1 of 1986"), placing the detenue under detention in Central Special Prison, Kadapa,. The said order of detention was confirmed by the 1st respondent vide G.O.Rt.No.1675 dated 21.08.2023, treating the detenue as 'Drug offender" as defined under Sec.2 (f) of Act, 1 of 1986. The following are cases, that have been taken into consideration by the 2nd respondent, while placing the detenue under detention:

S.N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top