Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B.S.BHANUMATHI
N. Lakshmi Devi, W/o. Venkata Naidu – Appellant
Versus
M.Rama Naidu, S/o Sreeramulu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in execution proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural compliance. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's directive to follow supreme court guidelines. (Para 4) |
| 4. decision to allow civil revision petition. (Para 5) |
The Court made the following Order:
B.S.BHANUMATHI, J.
This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the inaction of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram in not disposing E.P No.65 of 2023 in O.S.No.265 of 2011.
2. The execution petition was filed under Order XXIV rule 8 (3) C.P.C. The execution petition was coming for filing counter, but as no counter was filed, on 05.12.2024, the execution Court gave an opportunity to file counter by recording that, counter is treated as Nil. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned from time to time for hearing on 09.01.2025, 23.01.2025, 17.02.2025, 10.03.2025, 17.04.2025, 21.04.2025, 29.04.2025, 16.05.2025, 09.07.2025, 18.07.2025, 12.08.2025, 28.08.2025, 09.10.2025, 28.10.2025, 27.11.2025.
3. In the light of the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that the execution Court has not followed the decision of the
Execution Courts must prioritize timely disposal of execution petitions as per Supreme Court guidelines to uphold judicial efficiency and integrity.
Execution petitions must be resolved within six months of filing to prevent undue delays in justice delivery.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
