SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 356

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
ABDUL RASHEED @ PUTTU BAYER S/O AHMED HOSINAR – Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 35272 of 2019
Decided On : 19-09-2022

Subject

Case Management - Dismissal

Headnote

Finding of the Court: Despite order, none appears for petitioner - It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting matter.

Result: W.P. dismissed.

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: VENKATESH NAIK.
For the Respondents: KIRAN S. JAVALI, MAHESH SHETTY.

ORDER :

1. Despite the order dated 07.09.2022, none appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, this petition is de-linked from W.P. No. 35263/2019 c/w W.P. No. 35920/2019 and W.P. No. 38875/2019 and dismissed for non-prosecution.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top