Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
ABDUL RASHEED @ PUTTU BAYER S/O AHMED HOSINAR – Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 35272 of 2019
Decided On : 19-09-2022
Finding of the Court: Despite order, none appears for petitioner - It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting matter.
Result: W.P. dismissed.
ORDER :
1. Despite the order dated 07.09.2022, none appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, this petition is de-linked from W.P. No. 35263/2019 c/w W.P. No. 35920/2019 and W.P. No. 38875/2019 and dismissed for non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed due to petitioner's repeated non-appearance indicating disinterest.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's repeated non-appearance.
A court may dismiss a petition for non-prosecution if the petitioners demonstrate a persistent lack of interest by failing to appear for multiple scheduled hearings.
A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear and show interest in the case.
A writ petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear in court after multiple listings.
Writ petition dismissed due to repeated non-representation by petitioner.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
