Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT DHARWAD
E.S. Indiresh, J.
Viththal Basappa Savadatti - Appellant
Versus
Director (administration And Human Resources) Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd., Cauveri Bhavan, K.g. Road, Bengaluru-560009 & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 147619 of 2020 (S-RES)
Decided On : 10-01-2023
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner approached the respondent-Corporation with a representation, which was unattended.Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondent-Corporation to consider the representation and inform the petitioner of the outcome.Issues:
Unattended representation by respondent-Corporation.Ratio Decidendi:
The court emphasized on addressing unattended representations within a specified time frame.Final Decision:
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.JUDGMENT
E.S. Indiresh, J. - Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has approached the respondent-Corporation by way of a representation dated 30.04.2020 and the same is unattended by the respondent-Corporation.
3. In that view of the matter, the respondent - Corporation is directed to consider the representation dated 30.04.2020 produced at Annexure-K to the writ petition within eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order and the outcome of the same to be made known to the petitioner. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
4. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Courts may direct authorities to consider representations within a specified time frame and inform the concerned parties of the outcome.
Court directed timely response to the petitioner's pending representation under Article 226.
The court mandated timely consideration of the petitioner's representation for cancellation of company incorporation under Article 226.
The Court affirms the obligation of public authorities to respond and resolve representations made by petitioners in a timely manner.
Mandamus directs authorities to consider representations on merits within stipulated time.
The judgment emphasizes the right to a fair hearing and requires that all parties involved in proceedings be given proper notice and opportunity to respond to representations and notices issued by au....
Court directs consideration of patta representation within 12 weeks via mandamus.
The court established that while it can direct the consideration of representations, it does not dictate the outcome of such considerations.
The court emphasized the necessity for timely consideration of loan applications by financial institutions as per previous directives.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
