Back
H. P. SANDESH
Tejas Kumar R. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H.P. Sandesh, J. - The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo of even date seeking permission to withdraw the petition as not pressed.
2. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Not applicable
Dismissal of a petition can be based on a memo filed by the petitioner's counsel seeking withdrawal of the petition.
N/A
N/A
The court upheld the petitioner's right to unilaterally withdraw the original petition without opposition.
A petitioner has the right to withdraw their petition, leading to its dismissal without further proceedings.
A petitioner retains the absolute right to withdraw a writ petition at any stage, and upon formal submission, the court should allow such withdrawal.
The court's decision to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn was based on the memo filed by the appellant's counsel seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
The court affirmed the right to withdraw an original petition, leading to its dismissal.
A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and upon the filing of a 'not-pressed' memo, the court will dismiss the petition as withdr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
