SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Mulberry Silks Ltd. (Formerly Known As M/S Mulberry Silk International Ltd. ), Represented By Its Assistant General Manager Mr. Dinesh Mathur – Appellant
Versus
N. G. Chowdappa, S/o. Sri. N. Gangappa – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
2. The petitioner is a company carrying on the business of manufacturing of silk fabrics from the year 1996. On 24.07.2002, a domestic enquiry was held in which the respondent was found guilty of misconduct and his services came to be dismissed vide order dated 06.08.2003. The respondent along with four others filed an application No.1/2004 under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, ‘the Act’) claiming full wages from the date of dismissal till filing of the application. The objections were filed.
3. During the pendency of the application, four workmen except the respondent settled their claim with the petitioner vide a settlement agreement dated 10.04.2008. As such application No.1/2004 referred to supra continued only in respect of res
The KCP Ltd Vs. The Presiding Officer & Ors.
Ram Prasad Vishwakarma vs. The Chairman Industrial Tribunal
State of UP & Others vs. Brijpal Singh
Managing Director, NEKRTC Karnataka V.S Shivasharanappa
Andhra Pradesh R.T.C. vs. B.S. David Paul
A.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. v. Abdul Kareem
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. v. Shyam Bihari Lal Gupta
State Bank of India vs. Ram Chandra Dubey & Ors.
State of U.P. and Another v. Brijpal Singh MANU/SC/2466/2005: AIR 2006 SC 3592
State Bank of India v. Ram Chandra Dubey
State of U.P. and Another v. Brijpal Singh
M/s Herbertsons Ltd vs. The Workmen of Herbertsons Ltd.
M/s National Engineering Industries Ltd vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation vs. Satyaprakash
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. vs. Rameshwar Dayal reported in AIR 1961 SC 689
P.H. Kalyani vs. M/s Air France Calcutta reported in AIR 1963 SC 1756
Lalla Ram vs. D.C.M. Chemicals Works Ltd. reported in 1978 (3) SCC 1
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and another versus Satya Prakash
Jaipur Zilla Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas vs. Ram Gopal Sharma
Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. vs. Ram Gopal Sharma and another
Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. vs. S.N. Modak
Punjab Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Chandirarh vs. Suresh Chand & Anr.
Engineering Laghu Udyog Employees’ Union Vs. Judge, Labour Court and Industrial Tribunal
Duncan Engineering Ltd. Vs. Ajay C. Shelke
T.N. State Transport Corporation v/s. Neethivilangan, Kumbakonam
Section 33(C)(1) of I.D.Act deals with situation where money is due to a workman under a settlement or an award.
Dismissal during pendency of industrial proceedings without Section 33(2)(b) approval renders it inoperative; workman deemed continuing in service with automatic reinstatement and adjusted back wages....
Non-compliance with the mandatory provision of Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 renders the dismissal order void and inoperative, and the employer is bound to treat the employee ....
The court affirmed that dismissal without approval under Section 33(2)(b) is inoperative, and the employee is deemed to continue in service until approval is granted.
Section 33 (2) of I.D. Act reads as conditions of service, etc., to remain unchanged under certain circumstances during pendency of proceedings.
Workers can claim back wages if dismissed without statutory approval under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, as such dismissals are deemed void.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.