IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
PRASANNA B. VARALE, KRISHNA S. DIXIT, JJ.
Hucchappa Nagappa Jadiyannanavar S/o Nagappa – Petitioner
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 3487 of 2023
Decided On : 08-09-2023
Electricity is considered a basic amenity and a right to life. The Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana - Saubhagya aims to provide electricity connections to all un-electrified households in rural and urban areas. Lack of electricity supply affects education, health, and socio-economic rights. Access to electricity should be considered a human right. The grant of land for a power grid project by a government company is in abundant public interest. The delay in filing a petition and the extension of project timelines due to the COVID-19 pandemic are factors to be considered.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the grant of land to Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. for a power grid project. They claimed that the grant deprived the villagers of grazing land without following due procedure. They also argued that there was a breach of the condition stipulated in the grant order as the project had not been completed within two years. The official respondents justified the grant and argued that the public interest in the project outweighed the arguments in the petition. The court declined to intervene, stating that the grant was made for a government company for the purpose of establishing a power grid, which is a basic amenity. The court also noted that the delay in filing the petition and the extension of the project timeline due to the COVID-19 pandemic were factors to be considered. The petition was dismissed.
Finding of the Court:
The court agreed with the official respondents that the grant was made for a government company for a public purpose. The court cited previous judgments emphasizing the importance of electricity as a basic amenity and a right to life. The court also referred to the Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana - Saubhagya and other judgments highlighting the significance of electricity in society. The court concluded that the grant was in abundant public interest and the arguments in the petition were insignificant compared to the importance of electricity generation and transmission. The court also considered the delay in filing the petition and the extension of the project timeline due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ratio Decidendi: The grant of land for a power grid project by a government company for a public purpose is in abundant public interest. Electricity is a basic amenity and a right to life. The delay in filing a petition and the extension of the project timeline due to the COVID-19 pandemic are factors to be considered.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
1. Petitioners claiming to be public spirited citizens residing in the two villages of Hirekeruru Taluka, in Haveri District, have filed this Public Interest Litigation for laying a challenge to the Deputy Commissioner's order dated 10.03.2020 a copy whereof avails at Annexure-F whereby a small extent of 4 Acres having been carved out from a large extent of 34A-21G in Sy. No. 109 of Chinnamulugunda Village, has been granted to the 5th Respondent - Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd., for the 110-11 KV Electric Project. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that, this grant has deprived the Villagers of grazing land without following due procedure and therefore, the same is liable to be voided, coupled with a direction to the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to consider their Representations at Annexure-G to G4 wherein cancellation of the said grant is sought for. Learned counsel also adds that despite the lapse of two years, the Project has not come up and thus, there is breach of the 1st Condition stipulated in the impugned order and therefore, the Grant should be rescinded.
2. Learned Addl. Government Advocate on request appearing for the official Respondents opposes the Writ Petition making submission in justification of the impugned order and the reasons on which it has been structured. She points out that what has been allotted to the KPTCL is only a small portion of 04 Acres and that the remaining huge land left for the villagers is more than 30 Acres. She also points out enormous delay brooked in the matter with no explanation whatsoever offered by the petitioners therefor. Lastly, she contends that the public interest involved in the Project in question obviously outweighs the arguable one in this Writ Petition. She also explains that while computing the period of one year stipulated in the impugned order as a condition, stands elongated because Apex Court orders issued during the period of Covid-19 Pandemic and therefore, there is no breach of the same. So contending, she seeks dismissal of the Writ Petition.
3. We have heard the leaned counsel for the parties and we have perused the Petition papers. Having done that, we decline indulgence in the matter broadly agreeing with the submissions made on behalf of official Respondents. Admittedly, the Grant of land is not to any private person nor for any private purpose. It is made for the purpose of establishing a Power Grid and allied structures by the 5th Respondent-KPTCL which happens to be a cent percent Government Company as defined under Section 2(45) of the Companies Act, 2013. Apparently, it is an instrumentality of the State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India in the light of decision of the Apex Court in R.D. Shetty vs. International Airport Authority Limited, AIR 1979 SC 1628. The Apex Court in Dilip vs. Satish and Others, 2022 SCC Online SC 810, at Paragraph 9 has observed “it is now well settled proposition of law that electricity is a basic amenity of which a person cannot be deprived....” It hardly needs to be stated that the electricity happens to be the lifeblood of people, be they peasants, labourers, industrialists, businessmen or of any avocation.
4. The Central Government has promulgated Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana - Saubhagya in October, 2017 inter-alia with the following salient features:
(ii) Providing Solar Photo Voltaic (SPV) based standalone systems of un-electrified households located in remote and inaccessible villages/habitations where grid extension is not feasible or cost effective.
(ii) Providing last mile connectivity and electricity connections to all remaining economically poor un-electrified households in urban areas.”
The Punjab and Haryana High Court in Om Prakash vs. Balkar Singh, 2022 SCC Online P&H 3733 has said “.....the electricity being a basic necessity, is an integral part of Right
The grant of land for a power grid project by a government company for a public purpose is in abundant public interest. Electricity is a basic amenity and a right to life.
The court's decision was influenced by the completion and functionality of the electric line, the failure of the villagers to substantiate their claims, and the analysis of the provisions of the Elec....
The court upheld the legality of restricting access to land for infrastructure repairs under Section 163 of the BNSS, emphasizing the urgency of preventing national loss due to electricity wastage.
The court established that statutory compliance in transmission projects under the Electricity Act permits necessary adjustments while safeguarding public interests, affirming the adequacy of legal r....
The court upheld the validity of the District Magistrate's order permitting the laying of a transmission line, affirming that adequate notice and opportunity were provided to affected farmers, thus a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.