M. NAGAPRASANNA
Sandeep Bhatt S/o Vinaychandra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners are before this Court calling in question the registration of a crime in Crime No.3/2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 506, 504 & 306 of the IPC.
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel Shri Pramod Khatavi appearing on behalf of Shri P.P. Hittalamani for the petitioners; learned HCGP Shri V.S. Kalasuramth appearing for the respondent No.1 -State; & learned counsel Shri G.N. Narasammanavar appearing for respondent No.2 – complainant.
3. The 2nd respondent is the complainant, the father of one Parashuram N.K., who dies committing suicide. The complainant was an erstwhile employee of Harihar Poly Fibers. After his retirement, the appointment was offered to his son – one Parashuram N.K. The son was in the habit of remaining unauthorisedly absent, intermittently. This leads the employer to issue several notices to the son directing him to report back to duties. On several such instances he does report back to duties and remains unauthorisedly abse
AMALENDU PAL V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) [(2009) 16 SCC 605 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 367]
GURUCHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
GURCHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
KANCHAN SHARMA Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
Mangat Ram v. State of Haryana
RAMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
State of W.B. v. Orilal Jaiswal [(1994) 1 SCC 73: 1994 SCC (Cri) 107]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.