Back
ANU SIVARAMAN, G BASAVARAJA
Ravish Hastantram – Appellant
Versus
Sachin Nagarajappa S/O Dr. A. H. Nagarajappa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G BASAVARAJA, J.
1. These intra-court appeals are preferred against the order dated 21st June 2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.11179 of 2020.
2. Writ Appeal No.883 of 2022 is filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (for short hereinafter referred to as "BDA"), challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.11179 of 2020. One Ravish Hastantaram has preferred Writ Appeal No.593 of 2024 challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge in the above mentioned writ petition, contending that he has purchased the property in question in public e-auction conducted by the Bangalore Development Authority.
3. Facts leading to Writ Appeal No.883 of 2022 are that, the appellant-Bangalore Development Authority (for short hereinafter referred to as "BDA") issued e-Auction notification dated 4th September 2020, to auction several of its corner sites and intermediate sites under BDA (disposal of corner sites and commercial cites) Rules, 1984 (for short hereinafter referred to as "Rules"), as per the terms and conditions stipulated therein.
3.1. In respect of e-Auctioning site No.276, HSR-IV Sector is concerned, the initial b
The BDA has the authority to reject bids in e-Auctions without justification, as per its Rules, and such discretion is not subject to judicial review unless proven arbitrary.
The highest bidder at public auctions only has a right of consideration and is subject to evaluation against the reserve price. No concluded contract comes into being until the bid is accepted by the....
Point of Law - Once State decides to grant any right or privilege to others, then there is no escape from rigour of Article 14.
The highest bidder is not entitled to the issuance of a Regular Letter of Allotment unless the bid is accepted by the competent authority. The rejection of the bid by the competent authority must be ....
No vested right is established from bid submission; rejection of bid is valid when corporation ensures public interest and current market rates prevail.
The highest bidder at public auctions has no vested right until the bid is confirmed by the competent authority, and the court's interference in contractual and commercial matters should be minimal.
The highest bidder in an auction does not have a vested right, and the authority has the discretion to cancel bids in the interest of public revenue.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
