IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
D-VOIS Communications Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial overview of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments about the existence of an arbitration agreement. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. analysis of the arbitration clause's ambiguity and its implications. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. judicial interpretation of 'may' vs 'shall' in arbitration context. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling against arbitration. (Para 15) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioner/plaintiff is at the doors of this Court, calling in question an order dated 16-10-2024 passed by the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru in Commercial O.S.No.207 of 2024, by which the application filed by the defendant seeking reference of the matter to Arbitration comes to be allowed and consequently seeks restoration of the suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff.
2. Heard Sri Skandan P. Jain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Aniketh B.C. learned counsel appearing for the caveator/respondent.
3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows: -
The petitioner inter alia engages in the business of operating and managing a chain of business centers/co-working space under the name of “Bhive Workspace” which provides office space to individu
Foomill Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Affle (India) Ltd.
BGM and M-RPL-JMCT (JV) v. Eastern Coalfields Limited
Jagdish Chander v. Ramesh Chander
Food Corporation of India v. National Collateral Management Services Limited (NCMSL)
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. v. IVRCL AMR Joint Venture
Quick Heal Technologies Limited v. NCS Computech Private Limited
Enercon (India) Limited v. Enercon GMBH
Powertech World Wide Limited v. Delvin International General Trading LLC
Babanrao Rajaram Pund v. Samarth Builders and Developers
Visa International Limited v. Continental Resources (USA) Limited
Blue Star Limited v. Rahul Saraf
Bharat Bhushan Bansal v. U.P. Small Industries Corpn. Ltd.
Bihar State Mineral Development Corpn. v. Encon Builders (I) (P) Ltd.
An agreement with a clause stating disputes 'may' be resolved through arbitration does not constitute a binding arbitration agreement under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, as it does not reflec....
The use of 'may' in arbitration agreements indicates optionality rather than obligation, requiring mutual consent for arbitration to be valid.
Appointment of Arbitrator – Arbitration agreement is foundation of arbitration – Referral Court before appointing Arbitral Tribunal will have to be prima facie satisfied that arbitration agreement as....
Arbitration agreement – Mere mentioning of terms ‘arbitration’ or ‘arbitrator’ in heading or existence of these terms in scattered manner in clauses of agreements between parties do not aggregate to ....
(1) Reference of disputes to arbitration – Alternate Dispute Resolution mechanisms or more particularly, arbitration, can only be the chosen method if both/all parties to dispute can agree that it wi....
The judgment establishes the requirement of a written agreement for arbitration, the interpretation of settlement of disputes clauses, and the significance of party conduct in determining the existen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.