SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Kar) 28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ASHOK S.KINAGI, J.
Shree Bhavani School Of Nursing – Petitioner 
Versus 
The Karnataka State Diploma In Nursing – Respondent 
WRIT PETITION NO. 212 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)
Decided On : 08-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Pradeep Kumar P K., Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. Sudarshan Suresh, Advocate

Educational institutions must be afforded the opportunity to rectify inadvertent administrative errors to ensure fairness in educational processes.

Headnote:(A) Karnataka State Nursing Council - Writ petition for mandamus - The petitioner sought to direct the Karnataka State Diploma in Nursing Examination Board to consider the representation for generating registration numbers of students and permitting them to attend exams - The request was not considered due to a technical error in online submission of student details - The court ordered for the Board to consider the representation and allow students to take the examination. (Paras 1, 3, 6)

(B) Educational Institutions - Right to fair opportunity - Institutions must be allowed to rectify inadvertent errors in administrative processes to ensure fairness in educational assessments and opportunities. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petition was filed by an educational institution to allow students to take the 1st year GNM Course Final Examination after failing to upload necessary details due to a technical issue before the deadline.

Findings of Court:
The writ petition was disposed of directing the respondent Board to consider the representation and allow the students to take the examinations, with a deadline for submission of records set for 10.02.2026.

Issues: The main issue was whether the respondent Board could allow a late submission of students' details due to technical difficulties that prevented compliance with the deadline.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that fairness necessitated the consideration of the institution's late request, emphasizing the right to opportunity and rectification of inadvertent errors within administrative processes.

Result: Writ petition disposed of in favor of the petitioners.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for exam eligibility. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. respondent's willingness to consider representation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court orders board to consider registration. (Para 6)

ORDER :

ASHOK S.KINAGI, J.

1. The petitioners filed this writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Karnataka State Diploma in Nursing Examination Board to consider the representation of petitioner No.1-Institution dated 27.01.2025 vide Annexure-E, by generating the registration number of petitioner Nos.2 to 50, and further permitting petitioners Nos.2 to 50 to take up the 1st year GNM Course Final Examination scheduled to commence from 12.01.2026.

2. Brief facts leading rise to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:

3. Petitioner No.1-Institution is an educational institution engaged in imparting General Nursing course namely Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery. The Nursing School was started after obtaining the requisite permission from the concerned government, and the affiliation will be from the Karnataka State Nursing Council. Petitioner No.1-Institution admitted the students for Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery for the academic year 2024-2025 and permitted intake of petitioner Nos.1 is 60. On 08.01.2025, the respondent issued notification indicating the last day to upload the details of the students in the web portal of the respondent-Board is on 20.01.2025. Petitioner No.1 could not upload the list of students along with their Marks cards, online, in the website of the board. Petitioner No.1 addressed a letter to the respondent and requested them due to technical error, the institution could not upload the details and requested them to approve the admissions vide communication dated 27.01.2025. The respondent Board did not consider the request made by petitioner No.1. Hence, this writ petition.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned counsel for the respondent Board.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent Board submits that, if reasonable time is granted to the Board, the Board will consider the representation vide Annexure-E, and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

6. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent Board, I proceed to pass the following order:

ORDER

i. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent Board to consider Annexure-E by generating the registration number of petitioner Nos.2 to 50 and permit petitioner Nos.2 to 50 to take up 1st year GNM Course Final Examination scheduled to commence from 12.01.2026, and the petitioner is directed to furnish all the relevant records to the Board on or before 10.02.2026.

ii. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top