SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Kar) 149

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ASHOK S.KINAGI, J.
MES School Of Nursing Represented By Its Principal Smt.Malathi - Appellant 
Vs.
The Karnataka State Diploma In Nursing Examination Board - Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 234 of 2026 (EDN-RES)
Decided On : 08-01-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Pradeep Kumar P K., Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri. Sudharshan Suresh, Adv.

Educational institutions facing technical obstacles in complying with procedural timelines must be accommodated for fairness in examination participation.

Headnote:(A) Writ Jurisdiction - Educational Law - Mandamus - The petitioners sought directions for the board to consider their representation regarding student registrations for the 1st year GNM Course Final Examination. The institution had faced a technical error that hindered timely submission. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Administrative Procedure - The court emphasized that the board must consider submissions from educational institutions in accordance with legal provisions. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, an educational institution, failed to upload details for 48 students for examination due to technical difficulties despite their timely permission to operate. A representation was made to the board but was not addressed.

Findings of Court:
The board is directed to consider the representation and allow the students to take the examination, conditional on the timely submission of required records by the petitioners.

Issues: The critical question was the procedural fairness in allowing the students to sit for the examination given the circumstances of technical failure in submission.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that educational bodies are entitled to reasonable accommodation for procedural deficiencies caused by technical issues, affirming the necessity of administrative fairness.

Result: Writ petition allowed, with directives issued to the board.

Table of Content
1. filing of writ petition and background of the case (Para 1 , 2)
2. court hearing and respondent's willingness to consider (Para 3 , 4)
3. order to consider representation and allow examination (Para 5)
4. disposal of pending applications (Para 6)

ORDER :

ASHOK S.KINAGI, J.

The petitioners filed this writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Karnataka State Diploma in Nursing Examination Board to consider the representation of petitioner No.1-Institution dated 27.01.2025 vide Annexure-E, by generating the registration number of petitioner Nos.2 to 49, and further permitting petitioners Nos.2 to 49 to take up 1st year GNM Course Final Examination scheduled to commence from 12.01.2026.

2. Brief facts, leading rise to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:

Petitioner No.1-Institution is an educational institution engaged in imparting General Nursing course namely Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery. The Nursing School was started after obtaining the requisite permission from the concerned government and the affiliation will be from the Karnataka State Nursing Council. Petitioner No.1-Institution admitted the students for Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery for the academic year 2024-2025 and permitted intake of petitioner No.1 is 60. On 08.01.2025, the respondent issued notification indicating the last day to upload the details of the students in the web portal of the respondent-Board is on 20.01.2025. Petitioner No.1 could not upload the list of 48 students along with their Marks cards, online, in the website of the board. Petitioner No.1 addressed a letter to the respondent, and requested them due to technical error, the institution could not upload the details and requested them to approve the admissions vide communication dated 27.01.2025. The respondent did not consider the representation made by petitioner No.1.

Hence, this writ petition.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned counsel for the respondent.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, if reasonable time is granted to the Board, the Board will consider the representation vide Annexure-E and would pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the Board, the writ petition is disposed off, directing the respondent to consider Annexure-E by generating the registration number of petitioner Nos.2 to 49 and permit petitioner Nos.2 to 49 to take up 1st year GNM Course Final Examination scheduled to commence from 12.01.2026, and the petitioner is directed to furnish all the relevant records to the Board on or before 10.02.2026.

6. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed off accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top