Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA
F. M. Hunashikatti – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, Represented By Its Principal Secretary, State Of Karnataka, Department Of Animal Husbandry And Fisheries – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's long continuous service. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for regularization based on government orders. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis on employment status and rights. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER :
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
1. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the action of the 4th respondent–University in declining to consider his case for regularisation of service, notwithstanding the fact that the petitioner has been in continuous employment for more than ten years, as required under various Government Orders issued from time to time.
2. Heard Sri.C.S.Shettar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt.Girija S. Hiremath, learned HCGP for respondent No.1, Sri.P.N.Hatti, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Sri.Ramachandra Mali, learned counsel for respondent No.3.
3. The facts, in brief germane, are as follows:
The petitioner joined the services of the 1st respondent–Department of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries on 19.03.1977. It transpires that the 1st respondent engaged the services of the petitioner on a nominal muster roll or on a consolidated monthly pay. Owing to certain omissions and commissions, the petitione
Continuous service exceeding ten years entitles the employee to consideration for regularization, requiring adherence to prior court directives and government orders.
Long-term employees performing essential and continuous functions may claim regularization after a decade of service, despite previous procedural irregularities.
The court reaffirmed that long-serving employees, despite irregular appointments, are entitled to regularization, emphasizing the importance of continuity of service without considering minor lapses ....
Long-standing service and fulfillment of criteria establish entitlement for regularization under service law, preventing arbitrary denial of rights.
Regularization of employees with irregular appointments who have served for a significant duration is constitutionally mandated when they fulfill essential duties, emphasizing equity and justice in p....
Regularization of long-serving daily wage employees is mandated after 10 years of service, acknowledging functional continuity despite initial irregularities, violating constitutional rights otherwis....
Long-standing service without a formal appointment does not deny employees the right to regularization; discriminatory treatment of similarly situated employees violates principles of equity and fair....
Long-serving employees in essential roles are entitled to consideration for regularization despite initial irregular appointments, ensuring fairness and adherence to constitutional principles.
Long-term employees, fulfilling essential duties, are entitled to regularization after 10 years of service despite irregular appointments, emphasizing fairness and preventing exploitation.
Longstanding service in public roles warrants regularisation and cannot be arbitrarily denied based on technicalities; constitutional principles require fair treatment of employees.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
