SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2627

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Indian Plywood Employees Co-Op Consumers' Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 107614, 107649, 107652, 107670, 107674, 107693, 107731, 107742, 107797 of 2025
Decided On : 19-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sourabh Hegde
For the Respondents: Ramesh Chigari, G.V. Bharamagoudar

Electoral processes must comply with rules requiring individual notice for excluded members to ensure fair participation and transparency in elections.

Headnote:(A) Co-operative Societies Act - Section 70(2) - Election process - Compliance with rules regarding the preparation of the electoral roll and voter notification - Court held that the exclusion of members must be preceded by individual notice as per Rule 13-D (2-A) - As petitioners were not notified of deficiencies in the electoral roll preparation, their votes must be counted. (Paras 10-12)

(B) Legal principles - Electorate participation in elections necessitates that all eligible voters be properly notified of their status and provisions must be adhered to for fair elections - The court emphasizes the need for transparency and compliance in electoral processes.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a co-operative society, contested the exclusion of certain votes during the elections conducted on 23.04.2022. The respondents admitted procedural deficiencies in the preparation of the Final Electoral Roll and in notifying the petitioners.

Findings of Court:
Writ petitions directed the Returning Officer to announce the election results, including the votes of excluded petitioners, while preserving the right for aggrieved parties to seek redress under Section 70(2) of the Co-operative Societies Act.

Issues: The core questions pertained to the validity of excluding votes without proper notice and ensuring adherence to the electoral process regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that excluding members from the electoral list without individual notification contravenes established rules and that the election's integrity is paramount.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; the Returning Officer was directed to announce the results, counting the votes of the petitioners.

Table of Content
1. issue covered by previous judgment. (Para 1)
2. arguments concerning adherence to rule 13d. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. requirements for the electoral process must be strictly adhered to. (Para 6)

ORDER :

1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties in unison would submit that, the issue in the lis stands covered by judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No.8502/2022 c/w. W.P. No.8477/2022, disposed off on 7th June 2022. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court held as follows:

“8. In the light of these rival submissions, the question for consideration is:

Whether these writ petitions must be disposed of directing the Returning Officer [the fourth respondent and sixth respondents in the respective petitions to announce the results of the elections held on 23.04.2022 including the votes cast by the petitioners.

9. The provisions of Rule 13-D (2-A) of the Rules read as hereunder:

(3) The Election Officer shall take steps for publication of voters list in the following manner, namely:-

(a) for publication of draft eligible electoral list, a list of defaulters, a list of members whose repayment falls due, before the election date clear fifty days;

(b) for calling objections, if any, calling upon the defaulter members to repay the amounts due to the co-operative societies on or before thirty clear days prior to the date of election;

(c) the scrutiny and verification of the voters list after payment by defaulters etc., clear twenty days before the ate of election.

(d) for publication of final eligible voters list before fifteen clear days prior to the date of election.

The underlining is by this Court.

10. These provisions do not leave any room for doubt that an excluded member, with the publication of the Draft Eligible Electoral List, must have an opportunity by way of an individual notice to file objections on exclusion from the Electoral List. It must be shown that the concerned Chief Executive has prepared and sent notice to the affected members. The Public Notice dated 8.11.2021 does not meet these requirements. In fact, it is admitted on behalf of the respondents that there are deficiencies in the preparation of the Final Electoral Roll after the publication of the Draft Eligible Electoral List, and the petitioners have not been issued with individual notices.

11. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugha Utpadak Sanstha and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others supra has held as follows:

‘7. A perusal of the Rules discloses that the preparation of provisional list of voters, filing of objection against the provisional list of voters, consideration of the objection by the Collector and finalising the list of voters, all occur in the Rules which cover the entire process of the election. The Rules framed for election of specified societies are complete code in itself providing for the entire process of election beginning from the stage of preparation of the provisional voters list, decision on the objection by the Collector, finalisation of electoral rolls, holding of election and declaration of result of the election. In view of the scheme of the Act and Rules, the preparation of voters' list must be held to be part of the election process for constituting managing committee of a specified society.

12. In view of our finding that preparation of the electoral roll is being an intermediate stage in the process of election of the managing committee of a specified society and the election process having been set in motion, it is well settled that the High Court should not stay the continuation of the election process even though there may be some alleged illegality or breach of rules while preparing the electoral roll. It is not disputed that the election in question has already been held and the result thereof has been stayed by an order of this Court, and once the result of the election is declared, it would be open to the appellant to challenge the election of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top