SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 3011

2025 KHC-D 14426
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Mallikarjun S/o Nilakanth Khodanpur – Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 107800 of 2025
Decided On : 28-10-2025
Advocates Appeared : 
For the Appellants : Shivaraj P. Mudhol, Anand Bagewadi
For the Respondents : Ramesh Chigari, G.V. Bharamagoudar

The electoral roll's preparation requires individual notices for excluded members, and deficiencies invalidate such exclusions, affirming the right to have votes counted.

Headnote:(A) Co-operative Societies Act - Section 70(2) - The preparation of the electoral roll, including individual notices to excluded members, is a critical part of the election process under the Co-operative Societies Rules. Deficiencies in notice provision were acknowledged, impacting the validity of the election results. (Paras 10 and 12)

(B) Electoral Process - The High Court should not stay the election process due to alleged irregularities unless substantial illegality is established. The Appellants were entitled to have their votes counted despite the deficiencies in the Final Electoral List preparation. (Paras 11 and 12)

Facts of the case:
Writ petitions were filed concerning an election held on 23.04.2022, where petitioners claimed that their votes were excluded from the electoral result announcement. There were admitted deficiencies in the provision of individual notices regarding their exclusion from the electoral roll.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the Returning Officer to announce election results, including the petitioners' votes, while leaving open all contentions for further proceedings under the Act.

Issues: The main issue was the validity of the exclusion of certain votes and whether proper notice was provided to the affected parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the electoral roll preparation is an essential part of the election process; the lack of individual notice renders the exclusion invalid. The court emphasized that High Courts should avoid halting electoral processes absent significant legal flaws.

Result: Writ petitions allowed.

Table of Content
1. background of the case and previous judgments. (Para 1)
2. request for similar order as previous cases. (Para 2)
3. procedural requirements for election process and electoral roll preparation. (Para 3)

ORDER :

1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties in unison would submit that, the issue in the lis stands covered by judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No.8502/2022 C/w. W.P. No.8477/2022, disposed off on 7th June 2022. The Coordinate Bench of this Court held as follows:

“8. In the light of these rival submissions, the question for consideration is:

Whether these writ petitions must be disposed of directing the Returning Officer [the fourth respondent and sixth respondents in the respective petitions to announce the results of the elections held on 23.04.2022 including the votes cast by the petitioners.

9. The provisions of Rule 13-D (2-A) of the Rules read as hereunder:

(3) The Election Officer shall take steps for publication of voters list in the following manner, namely:-

(a) for publication of draft eligible electoral list, a list of defaulters, a list of members whose repayment falls due, before the election date clear fifty days;

(b) for calling objections, if any, calling upon the defaulter members to repay the amounts due to the co-operative societies on or before thirty clear days prior to the date of election;

(c) the scrutiny and verification of the voters list after payment by defaulters etc., clear twenty days before the ate of election.

(d) for publication of final eligible voters list before fifteen clear days prior to the date of election. The underlining is by this Court.

10. These provisions do not leave any room for doubt that an excluded member, with the publication of the Draft Eligible Electoral List, must have an opportunity by way of an individual notice to file objections on exclusion from the Electoral List. It must be shown that the concerned Chief Executive has prepared and sent notice to the affected members. The Public Notice dated 8.11.2021, does not meet these requirements. In fact, it is admitted on behalf of the respondents that there are deficiencies in the preparation of the Final Electoral Roll after the publication of the Draft Eligible Electoral List, and the petitioners have not been issued with individual notices.

11. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugha Utpadak Sanstha and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others supra has held as follows:

‘7. A perusal of the Rules discloses that the preparation of provisional list of voters, filing of objection against the provisional list of voters, consideration of the objection by the Collector and finalising the list of voters, all occur in the Rules which cover the entire process of the election. The Rules framed for election of specified societies are complete code in itself providing for the entire process of election beginning from the stage of preparation of the provisional voters list, decision on the objection by the Collector, finalisation of electoral rolls, holding of election and declaration of result of the election. In view of the scheme of the Act and Rules, the preparation of voters' list must be held to be part of the election process for constituting managing committee of a specified society.

12. In view of our finding that preparation of the electoral roll is being an intermediate stage in the process of election of the managing committee of a specified society and the election process having been set in motion, it is well settled that the High Court should not stay the continuation of the election process even though there may be some alleged illegality or breach of rules while preparing the electoral roll. It is not disputed that the election in question has already been held and the result thereof has been stayed by an order of this Court, and once the result of the election is declared, it would be open to the appellant to challenge t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top