S. B. SHUKRE, G. A. SANAP
Mrunal Mandar Joshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
G.A. Sanap, J.
Heard. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. Initially this petition was filed seeking direction in the nature of mandamus to respondent No.3 to regularize the services of the petitioner as Assistant teacher with effect from 15/6/2016 and grant approval to the services of the petitioner as full time Assistant Teacher with effect from 15/6/2016. During the pendency of the petition, respondent No.3 vide order dated 10/9/2019 rejected the approval to the appointment as full time Teacher and therefore, the petitioner by amending the petition prayed for quashing this order.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that she was initially appointed on 13/8/2012 as part time shikshan sevak by following the required selection procedure with effect from 14/8/2012 to 13/8/2015. This part time appointment was approved in the year 2016. One Shri S. B. Pardeshi superannuated on 31/5/2016. The workload of part time Assistant Teacher for the subject of Chemistry which was handled by Shri S.B. Pardeshi became available. The petitioner was already appointed and was handling the workload of part time teacher for the su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.