Back
PRASANNA B. VARALE, SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
Sharad Darade – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding deceased and fir (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioners' common arguments against fir (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's evaluation of why fir lacks substantial basis (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's rationale for quashing the fir based on legal standards (Para 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 5. final orders quashing fir and affirmation of previous proceedings (Para 87 , 88 , 89) |
JUDGMENT :
Prasanna B. Varale, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for hearing and final disposal, at admission stage itself.
2. Though these bunch of Petitions are filed at the instance of individual Petitioners, in all these Petitions by way of principal prayers of quashment of first information report bearing No. 36 of 2021 dated 09th March, 2021, registered with Marine Drive Police Station, Mumbai for the offences punishable under Sections 306 , 506, 389, 120-B of INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for short “IPC”) read with Sections 3 (1)(N), 3(1)(P), 3(2)(ii), 3(2)(Va) of the Sch
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
