ROHIT B. DEO, ANIL L. PANSARE
Milindkumar s/o Sitaramji Jibhakate – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra Through Secretary Technical Education Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL L. PANSARE, J.
1. In both the Petitions, Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of parties.
2. The petitioners in both the petitions are working as Assistant Professors/Lecturers in Respondent No.7-Bapurao Deshmukh College of Engineering, Sevagram, Wardha. The College is being run by Respondent No.6-Yeshwant Rural Education Society, Wardha.
3. The respondent No.1 is the State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Technical Education; Respondent No.2 is the Joint Director of Technical Education, Nagpur; Respondent No.3 is the Principal Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education, (AICTE); Respondent No.4 is the Chairman (Regional) AICTE; Respondent no.5 is the Registrar of Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University; Respondent No.6 is the President, Yeshwant Rural Education Society; Respondent No.7 is the Principal, Bapurao Deshmukh College of Engineering, Wardha, Respondent No.8 is the General Secretary, Yeshwant Rural Education Society, whereas the Respondent No.9 is the Director of Technical Education.
4. We will hereinafter refer to the petitioners as ‘teachers’; Bapurao Deshmukh College of Engineering as the ‘College’; Yeshwant R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.