MANISH PITALE
PSP Projects Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corp. , through Municipal Commissioner – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. In this petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, two questions arise for consideration. Firstly, as to whether the Petitioner is entitled to seek appointment of Arbitrator by invoking an Arbitration clause contained in an agreement executed between the parties and if so whether the Arbitration Clause is hit by Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule to the said Act. Secondly, whether the Respondent forfeited its right to appoint Arbitrator, having failed to appoint one after expiry of the period specified in the notice invoking Arbitration issued by the Petitioner and upon the Petitioner filing the present petition before this Court.
2. Before discussing the position of law, in order to answer the aforesaid questions, in the light of the judgments brought to the notice of this Court, it would be appropriate to briefly state the facts, leading up to filing of the present petition.
3. The Petitioner is a company engaged in the business of construction and the Respondent is the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation. The Petitioner was a successful bidder in a tender floated by the Respondent – Corporation for construction
Union of India Vs. M/s. Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd.
Voestalpine Schienen GMBH Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
TRF Ltd vs. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd.
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC & Anr. vs. HSCC (India) Limited
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of an arbitrator must be in accordance with the law, and if found to be invalid, the court has the jurisdiction to set it asid....
The court affirmed that the claimant must secure the necessary Airport Entry Permits and upheld the arbitration award, ruling no breach by the respondent; consent regarding the arbitrator's appointme....
An employee of the respondent or even a retired employee would be ineligible to be appointed as an arbitrator. The panel of arbitrators should be broad-based and should include persons with diverse b....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of party autonomy in arbitration, the enforceability of the entire arbitration clause, and the conditional acceptance of arbitration....
The court emphasized the necessity for impartiality in arbitration, ruling that automatic appointments of arbitrators undermined the arbitration clause, rendering the award invalid.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of ensuring the independence and impartiality of arbitrators in the appointment process, as emphasized in relevant decisions of the ....
The appointment of the nominee arbitrator of the respondent is in accordance with law, and any reference of the claims from Arbitral Tribunal-2 to Arbitral Tribunal-1 without terminating the mandate ....
Disqualified arbitrators cannot appoint successors; unilateral requests do not waive statutory disqualifications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.