ARIF S. DOCTOR
Allan Sebastian D’Souza – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
1. The Petitioners are impugning an order dated 15th November 2021 (“the Impugned Order”) passed by Respondent No. 1 i.e. the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Tribunal. By the impugned order Respondent No. 1 has dismissed the Petitioners’ Application seeking condonation of delay in filing an Appeal under the provisions of Section 4(3) read with Section 45 (1A) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 (“the Slums Act”). The Petitioners had in the said Appeal challenged the declaration of land bearing CTS No. 1056A (part), admeasuring approximately 250 sq. mtrs of Village Kanjur, Taluka Kurla, Mumbai Suburban District, situated at Village Kanjur, Kanjur East, Mumbai 400 042 (“the said land”) as a slum.
2. The brief facts as set out in the Petition are as follows:
(ii) The said Sebastian D’Souza had constructed some chawls on land bearing C
Akhtar Hasan Rizvi vs. Harish R. Bhatt and Others
Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag vs. Katiji
Esha Bhattacharjee vs. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy
Gopal Narain vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
Harpal Singh and Others vs. The Union Territory of Chandigarh
Imam Mirasaheb Nadaf vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mohd. Akram Ansari vs. Chief Election Officer and Others
Mohinder Singh Gill and Another vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Others
State of Orissa vs. Sridhar Kumar Mallik and Others
Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam vs. Union of India and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.