Back
M. S. JAWALKAR
Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Ltd. , through its Authorized Signatory Manager (Legal) Aman Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, through it’s Chairman – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. At the request and by consent of parties matter is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission.
2. Brief facts which emerges from the record before me are as under :
Appellant is a company incorporated under Companies Act having production unit in Butibori. The company is engaged in manufacturing of synthetic filament yarn and synthetic staple fibre. Respondent No.1- Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Limited established by virtue of Section 3 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act to secure the orderly establishment of industrial area and industrial estate of industries in the State of Maharashtra and to assist generally in the organization thereof and to provide facilities at the lowest costs to the industries. Respondent No.3 is Butibori Manufacturers Association, is an association of industries which have their manufactories in the MIDC industrial estate, Butibori, Nagpur representing around 300 manufacturers. The Common Effluent Treatment Plant (for the sake of brevity CETP), respondent No.2 were formed to help the small scale industries to get their effluent treated through such, at lower costs to reduce their capital. This effluent t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for mutual consent to vary the terms of an existing agreement and the need for a clear modification or amendment to change the bill....
The court affirmed that damages for breach of contract must be substantiated with reasonable certainty, allowing for presumptive calculations in cases of difficulty in exact quantification.
A party to a contract is not entitled to question amount of consideration after signing contract.
The court ruled that a complaint for discharging trade effluent is invalid without proper sampling processes and that evidence must be assessed at trial for factual determinations.
Cenvat credit on effluent treatment services is admissible as integral to the manufacturing process, supporting revenue's compliance with pollution control norms.
Contract – Water Authority - Petitioners would not have given such undertakings, had they been put notice that Water Authority would be in a position to realise even entire amounts disbursed or a sub....
Treated industrial effluent cannot be discharged into storm water drains joining rivers unless meeting surface water standards (COD <50 mg/l), violating pollution laws despite general compliance; pol....
Industrial effluent discharge into storm water drain joining river violates law unless meeting surface water standards (COD <50 mg/l), despite industrial compliance; attracts polluter pays compensati....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
