SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 2061

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
B. P. Colabawalla, J.
M/s. Angerlehner Structural – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay – Respondent
Commercial Execution Application No. 54 of 2016
Decided On : 07-06-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Firoz and hyarujina, Senior Counsel a/w, Mr. Javed Gaya, Manek and hyarujina, Vidya Chaudhari, Mona Malvade i/b Chamber of Javed Gaya, for the Appellant; Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Counsel a/w Jitendra Mishra, Pooja Yadav, for the Respondent.

The main legal point established is that the liability to pay GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism rests with the recipient of the service, and the contract terms do not shift this liability.

Headnote:

GST Liability - Execution of Arbitral Award - The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Section 15(2)(d) and the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Section 20 - The court directed the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) to credit the amount of Rs.67,94,965.02, withheld towards GST liability, to the bank account of the Applicant, as the liability to pay the GST was on the MCGM under the Reverse Charge Mechanism.

Fact of the Case:

The Execution Application was filed to execute an Arbitral Award in favor of the Applicant against the MCGM. The MCGM withheld an amount towards GST liability, which was challenged by the Applicant.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the liability to pay GST was on the MCGM under the Reverse Charge Mechanism and directed the MCGM to credit the withheld amount to the Applicant's bank account.

Issues: The main issue was the liability of GST payment and whether the MCGM was justified in withholding the amount towards GST liability.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the MCGM, as the recipient of the service, was liable to pay the GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism, and the contract did not shift this liability to the Applicant.

Final Decision: The court directed the MCGM to credit the withheld amount towards GST liability to the Applicant's bank account, marking the Arbitral Award as fully satisfied.

ORDER

1. The above Execution Application is filed for executing the Arbitral Award dated 23rd June 2014 passed in favour of the Applicant and against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (for short the MCGM).

2. The MCGM was aggrieved by the Award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal, and therefore challenged the same before this Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Arbitration Act). However, the said challenge was repelled by a learned single judge of this Court vide his order dated 27th February 2019. Even an Appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act before the Division Bench of this Court was dismissed on 8th September 2021. The order of the Division Bench was thereafter challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by filing an SLP which was also dismissed on 22nd November 2021. The Hon'ble Supreme Court granted time to the MCGM up to 31st March 2022, to make payment to the Applicant.

3. In light of the above factual position, this Execution Application was moved before me on 9th March 2022. On the said date, it was pointed out to the Court that the Applicant, being a foreign entity, does not have a bank account in India (as the contract between the Applicant and the MCGM was concluded in 2003). The Applicant, therefore, requested that payment under the Arbitral Award be made by the MCGM in the name of the Applicant's lawyer and agent who would credit the same into the Applicant's account in escrow for transfer to the Applicant in Austria. The Escrow Agreement dated 3rd February 2022 was produced before the Court on the said date along with a letter dated 29th November 2021 written by the Applicant to the MCGM requesting them to credit the monies due under the Award to their lawyer's account to be held in escrow. A copy of the said Escrow Agreement dated 3rd February 2022 as well as the copy of the letter dated 29th November 2021 addressed by the Applicant to the MCGM were also taken on record and marked X and X-1 for identification. On the said date, namely, 9th March 2022, Mr. Sakhare, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the MCGM, fairly stated before the Court that the MCGM was willing to credit the monies due under the Arbitral Award to the account of the lawyers of the Applicant. He however submitted that it should be made clear that once these monies are paid, the MCGM is relieved of their liability under the Award and the Applicant would thereafter have no claim whatsoever against the MCGM. In light of the aforesaid submissions, this Court, on 9th March 2022, directed the MCGM to pay the amounts due under the Arbitral Award (dated 23rd June 2014) by crediting Bank Account No.5020035159821 in HDFC Bank Ltd, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021, on or before 31st March 2022. It was made clear that once the aforesaid payment was made, the liability of the MCGM under the Award dated 23rd June 2014 would stand satisfied and the Applicant would have no claim whatsoever against the MCGM (in relation to the Arbitral Award dated 23rd June 2014). It was also directed that the costs of Rs.1 Lakh deposited by the MCGM in this Court shall also be credited by the Prothonotary and Senior Master in the aforesaid Bank Account on or before 31st March 2022. Accordingly, the above Execution Application was placed on Board for compliance and disposal on 5th April 2022.

4. When the matter came up on 5th April 2022, it was pointed out to the Court that the amounts deposited in the aforesaid Bank Account was not the entire amount due and payable under the Award but after withholding an amount of Rs.67,94,965.02 allegedly towards payment of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), and which according to the MCGM, was the liability of the Applicant. It was pointed out that as per the Arbitral Award, the principal amount due was Rs.6,83,55,000/-and the interest amount due was Rs.4,45,4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top