SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 987

B. P. COLABAWALLA
Santana Rodrigues – Appellant
Versus
Francisco Xavier – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shivraj Gaonkar, Advocate, P.Sirvoicar, Advocate, Tukaram Gawas, Advocate, Byron Rodrigues, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This Writ Petition was originally ordered to be heard along with Writ Petition No.1389 of 2021 (F) as the parties were the same. However, all parties have agreed that Writ Petition No.1947 of 2021 (F) be heard first and disposed of and thereafter Writ Petition No.1389 of 2021 (F) be taken up. Accordingly, Rule is issued in the above Writ Petition. With the consent of parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally.

2. Writ Petition No.1947 of 2021 (F) [the above Writ Petition] was originally disposed of by a Judgment and Order dtd. 3/8/2022. After this order was passed, the Petitioner herein, preferred a Review Application to review/set aside the said order inter alia on the ground that the said order did not take into consideration the binding decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M. P. Steel Corporation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise [(2015) 7 SCC 58], and neither did it consider or deal with the arguments canvassed on behalf of the Petitioner [on the basis of the said Judgment]. This Court, after hearing the parties, by its order dtd. 10/1/2023, allowed the Review Application and set aside the order dtd. 3/8/2022. Consequently, it was direc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top