B. P. COLABAWALLA
Santana Rodrigues – Appellant
Versus
Francisco Xavier – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Writ Petition was originally ordered to be heard along with Writ Petition No.1389 of 2021 (F) as the parties were the same. However, all parties have agreed that Writ Petition No.1947 of 2021 (F) be heard first and disposed of and thereafter Writ Petition No.1389 of 2021 (F) be taken up. Accordingly, Rule is issued in the above Writ Petition. With the consent of parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally.
2. Writ Petition No.1947 of 2021 (F) [the above Writ Petition] was originally disposed of by a Judgment and Order dtd. 3/8/2022. After this order was passed, the Petitioner herein, preferred a Review Application to review/set aside the said order inter alia on the ground that the said order did not take into consideration the binding decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M. P. Steel Corporation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise [(2015) 7 SCC 58], and neither did it consider or deal with the arguments canvassed on behalf of the Petitioner [on the basis of the said Judgment]. This Court, after hearing the parties, by its order dtd. 10/1/2023, allowed the Review Application and set aside the order dtd. 3/8/2022. Consequently, it was direc
Cst vs. Madan Lal Das and Sons
Ganesan vs. T. N. Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board
Kandula Venkaiah vs. Kolli Venkateswara Rao
Kerala Seb vs. T.P. Kunhaliumma
M. P. Steel Corporation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Mukri Gopalan vs. Cheppilat Puthanpurayil Aboobacker
Omprakash vs. Ashwani Kumar Bassi
P. Sarathy vs. State Bank of India
Sangitabai W/O. Vasudeo Rajput vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.