URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through Anti Corruption Bureau – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By this appeal, the appellant (accused) has challenged judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 13.9.2004 passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Wardha (learned Special Judge) in Special Case No.3/1996.
2. By the said impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence, the accused is convicted for offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (the said Act).
For the offence under Section 7 of the said Act, the accused is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay fine Rs.300/-, in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two months
For the offence under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the said Act, he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine Rs.300/-, in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two months.
Learned Special Judge directed that all the sentences of the accused shall run concurrently.
3. The prosecution case in a nutshell runs, thus:
Bhiva Doulu Patil vs. State of Maharashtra
Devidas s/o Harichandra Bhaskar vs. State of Maharashtra
M.O. Shamsudhin vs. State of Kerala
Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan vs. State of Gujarat
Mohd. Iqbal Ahmad vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Mohmoodkhan Mahboobkhan Pathan vs. State of Maharashtra
Panalal Damodar Rathi vs State of Maharashtra
Punjabrao vs. State of Maharashtra
Raosaheb vs. State of Maharashtra
Shivchalappa Gurumorti Appa Loni vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.