URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Asha Babarao Vitalkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Through Anti Corruption Bureau – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant (accused) has challenged judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 28.2.2005 passed by learned Judge, Special Court, designated under The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (learned Judge of the trial court), Nagpur in Special Case No.5/1996.
2. By the said judgment and order of conviction impugned, learned Judge of the trial court convicted the accused for offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (the said Act) and sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for one year and to pay fine Rs.1000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for three months.
Learned Judge of the trial court also convicted the accused for offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the said Act and sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for three years and to pay fine Rs.2000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.
Learned Judge of the trial court also directed that all the sentences shall run concurrently.
3. During pendency of the appeal, the accused died and his legal heirs proceeded with the appeal with leave of the court.
4. Brief facts of the prosecution case run, as under:
The
Bhiva Doulu Patil vs. State of Maharashtra
M.O.Shamsudhin vs. State of Kerala
Mohd. Iqbal Ahmad vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Mohmoodkhan Mahboobkhan Pathan vs. State of Maharashtra
Panalal Damodar Rathi vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Karnataka vs. Ameerjan
State of Maharashtra vs. Rashid B.Mulani
State of Punjab vs. Sohan Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.