G. S. PATEL, KAMAL KHATA
Gufran Suleman Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Through the Legal Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GS Patel J.
1. Rule. There are Affidavits in Reply. Rule returnable forthwith.
2. This Petition reflects the kind of bureaucratic morass that might well have been an inspiration for Franz Kafka.
3. There is a road. Like many roads in Mumbai, it is narrower than it should be. The Municipal Corporation grants permission for redevelopment of a tall structure, one large enough to re-accommodate over a hundred tenants. It does so knowing that the road is not as wide as it should be. All 110 tenants vacate their homes. Construction commences. It comes up to the seventh floor. This is not sufficient to accommodate all the tenants. Nor is it the original proposal, which was for much more built up space. But it is only now that some functionary in the Ward Office awakens to the road width. He refuses permission to build higher. He says, astonishingly, that the road ‘is too narrow’. But the road is what it always was. It is not a living thing. It has neither expanded nor contracted since the time the original permission was sought and granted.
4. Implicit in this refusal is that the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (“MCGM”) is a complete stranger to its own roads and their width
(CA) Union of India v Anglo-Afghan Agencies
Central Cooperative Bank v Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank Employees Association & Anr
Chairman, All India Railway Recruitment Board & Anr v K Shyam Kumar & Ors.
Food Corporation of India v Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries. (1993) 1 SCC 71
Indian Ex-servicemen Movement & Ors v Union of India & Ors
Jitendra Kumar & Ors v State of Haryana & Anr.
Kerala State Beverages (M&M) Corporation Ltd v PP Suresh & Ors
Manuelsons Hotels Private Limited v State of Kerala And Ors.
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd vs Union of India (“Monnet Ispat”
Om Kumar & Ors v Union of India
Turner Morrison And Co Ltd v Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding nature of promissory estoppel on the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and the invocation of legitimate expectations to co....
Public authorities are bound by promises made under policies causing reliance in citizens, and arbitrary retraction of these commitments violates constitutional principles.
The court upheld the validity of permissions granted based on road width measurements, affirming the FAR of 275 for Protech Housing under applicable building bye-laws.
The court held that the Corporation of Kozhikode's decision to sell a portion of the property acquired for public road to respondents 3 to 5 was not tainted with malafides and was in accordance with ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the approval of the IPLP and the exercise of suo moto jurisdiction by the Commissioner, Nandyal municipality were found to be beyond the legal....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.