SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Nitin Jamdar, G.S. Kulkarni, Bharati Dangre, Manish Pitale, Amit Borkar, JJ.
Shri. Kumar Gorakhnath Shinde and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 11434 of 2016, Writ Petition No. 11557 of 2016
Decided On : 16-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwajit Mohite, Mr. Siddharth Karpe, Mr. Akshay Shinde, Mr. Ketan Joshi and Ms. Sneha Bhange Mr. Vijay Patil with Mr. Vishwajit V. Mohite, Mr. Siddharth Karpe, Mr. Akshay Shinde, Mr. Ketan Joshi and Ms. Sneha Bhange
For the Respondent:Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General with Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader, Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP, Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP, and Jay Sanklecha, Mr. Anil Anturkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh,Mr. Harshvardhan Suryavanshi, Mr. Yatin Malvankar, Mr. Atharva Date, Mr. Sumit Sonare, Mr. Sharad Dhore i/b. Mr. Prathamesh Bhargude, Mr. Dilip Bodake with Ms. Shraddha Pawar

A councillor elected as an independent candidate and part of a post-election Aghadi is governed by the Disqualification Act for all purposes, treated as a pre-poll Aghadi.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Section 63(2B) - Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986 - Section 3 - The court addressed whether a councillor elected as an independent candidate and part of an Aghadi formed post-election is governed by the Disqualification Act for all purposes or only for specific committees. The court found that the Aghadi, once registered, is treated as a pre-poll Aghadi for all purposes, including voting in any meeting of the Municipal Council. (Paras 46, 3, 12, 40)

(B) Legal Fiction - The court emphasized that the legal fiction created by the second Proviso to Section 63(2B) must be interpreted to achieve its intended purpose, which is to prevent political instability and ensure effective governance. (Paras 35, 44)

(C) Disqualification - The court ruled that disqualification under Section 3 of the Disqualification Act applies to members of the Aghadi formed under the second Proviso, reinforcing the need for adherence to party discipline. (Paras 46, 3)

Facts of the case:
The petitions arose from disqualification orders against independent candidates who formed the Mahabaleshwar Vikas Aghadi after the elections. The Collector disqualified them for not representing themselves as Aghadi members during committee elections.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the Aghadi formed under the second Proviso is governed by the Disqualification Act and is not limited to subject committees but applies to all meetings of the Council.

Issues: The main issue was whether the Aghadi formed post-election is subject to the provisions of the Disqualification Act for all purposes or only for specific committees.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once an Aghadi is registered under the second Proviso, it is treated as a pre-poll Aghadi for all purposes, ensuring that independent councillors adhere to the same standards and responsibilities as those in pre-poll Aghadis.

Result: The Full Bench's previous ruling was overruled, affirming that the Aghadi is governed by the Disqualification Act for all purposes.

JUDGMENT :

Nitin Jamdar, J.

The question this larger Bench is called upon to answer is whether a councillor who has contested the elections of a Municipal Council as an independent candidate and has formed/become part of an Aghadi registered pursuant to the second Proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 is governed by Section 3 of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986 for all purposes for all meetings as a member of such Aghadi till the term of the Council, or such an Aghadi is for a restricted purpose such as only for subject committees. Reference is made by the single judge of this Court doubting the correctness of the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Shah Faruq Shabir and Ors. vs. Govindrao Ramu Vasave and Ors., (2016) 5 Mh.L.J. 436, holding that the Aghadi registered under second Proviso to Section 63(2B) is for a restrictive purpose. Thus, the crux of the matter is whether the Aghadi under Section 63(2B) is intended for specific or all-encompassing purposes. The resolution of this dispute hinges on the interpretation of the above statutory provision.

2. The relevant statutory framework under consideration are the provisions from the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act 1986 (The Disqualification Act); the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Rules 1987. (The Disqualification Rules); the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 (Municipalities Act), and Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Qualifications and Appointment of Nominated councillors) Rules 2006-07.

3. The Disqualification Act received the assent of the Governor on 28 July 1987. The object of the Act is to curb defections and disqualify members of certain local authorities on the grounds of defection and related matters. Section 2(a) of the Disqualification Act defines an Aghadi as a group of persons who have formed themselves into a party to set up candidates for election to a local authority. The Municipalities Act is structured to provide a uniform pattern of administration and powers for Municipalities. Section 63 of the Municipalities Act falls under Chapter 3, which deals with the election and removal of the President and Vice President and their governing functions. Each Subject Committee of the Council consists of such number of councillors as the Council may determine. The Collector calls a special meeting of the Council to determine the number of members for each of the Subject Committees. In nominating the councillors, the Collector considers the relative strength of recognised parties or registered parties. It will be appropriate to reproduce the second Proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Municipalities Act at this stage.

Provided further that, for the purpose of deciding the relative strength of the recognised parties or registered parties or groups under this sub-section, the recognised parties or registered parties or groups, or elected Councillor not belonging to any such party or group may, notwithstanding anything contained in the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986, within a period of not more than one month from the date of notification of election results, form the Aghadi or front and, on its registration, the provisions of the said Act shall apply to the members of such Aghadi or front, as if it is a pre-poll Aghadi or front.

(emphasis supplied)

Thus, to decide the relative strength of the recognised parties or registered parties or groups, these parties or groups, or an elected councillor not belonging to any such party or group, may form an Aghadi or Front within one month from the notification of the election results. Upon its registration, the provisions of the said Disqualification Act shall apply to the members of such an Aghadi or Front as if it were a pre-poll Aghadi or Front. The interpretation of the phase

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top