SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NITIN JAMDAR, G. S. KULKARNI, BHARATI DANGRE, MANISH PITALE, AMIT BORKAR
Kumar Gorakhnath Shinde – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwajit Mohite, Mr. Siddharth Karpe, Mr. Akshay Shinde, Mr. Ketan Joshi and Ms. Sneha Bhange Mr. Vijay Patil with Mr. Vishwajit V. Mohite, Mr. Siddharth Karpe, Mr. Akshay Shinde, Mr. Ketan Joshi and Ms. Sneha Bhange
For the Respondent:Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General with Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader, Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP, Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP, and Jay Sanklecha, Mr. Anil Anturkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh,Mr. Harshvardhan Suryavanshi, Mr. Yatin Malvankar, Mr. Atharva Date, Mr. Sumit Sonare, Mr. Sharad Dhore i/b. Mr. Prathamesh Bhargude, Mr. Dilip Bodake with Ms. Shraddha Pawar

JUDGMENT :

Nitin Jamdar, J.

The question this larger Bench is called upon to answer is whether a councillor who has contested the elections of a Municipal Council as an independent candidate and has formed/become part of an Aghadi registered pursuant to the second Proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 is governed by Section 3 of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986 for all purposes for all meetings as a member of such Aghadi till the term of the Council, or such an Aghadi is for a restricted purpose such as only for subject committees. Reference is made by the single judge of this Court doubting the correctness of the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Shah Faruq Shabir and Ors. vs. Govindrao Ramu Vasave and Ors., (2016) 5 Mh.L.J. 436, holding that the Aghadi registered under second Proviso to Section 63(2B) is for a restrictive purpose. Thus, the crux of the matter is whether the Aghadi under Section 63(2B) is intended for specific or all-encompassing purposes. The resolution of this dispute hinges on the interpretation of the above statutory provision.

2

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top