IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Nitin Jamdar, G.S. Kulkarni, Bharati Dangre, Manish Pitale, Amit Borkar, JJ.
Shri. Kumar Gorakhnath Shinde and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 11434 of 2016, Writ Petition No. 11557 of 2016
Decided On : 16-07-2024
JUDGMENT :
Nitin Jamdar, J.
The question this larger Bench is called upon to answer is whether a councillor who has contested the elections of a Municipal Council as an independent candidate and has formed/become part of an Aghadi registered pursuant to the second Proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 is governed by Section 3 of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986 for all purposes for all meetings as a member of such Aghadi till the term of the Council, or such an Aghadi is for a restricted purpose such as only for subject committees. Reference is made by the single judge of this Court doubting the correctness of the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Shah Faruq Shabir and Ors. vs. Govindrao Ramu Vasave and Ors., (2016) 5 Mh.L.J. 436, holding that the Aghadi registered under second Proviso to Section 63(2B) is for a restrictive purpose. Thus, the crux of the matter is whether the Aghadi under Section 63(2B) is intended for specific or all-encompassing purposes. The resolution of this dispute hinges on the interpretation of the above statutory provision.
2. The relevant statutory framework under consideration are the provisions from the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act 1986 (The Disqualification Act); the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Rules 1987. (The Disqualification Rules); the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 (Municipalities Act), and Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Qualifications and Appointment of Nominated councillors) Rules 2006-07.
3. The Disqualification Act received the assent of the Governor on 28 July 1987. The object of the Act is to curb defections and disqualify members of certain local authorities on the grounds of defection and related matters. Section 2(a) of the Disqualification Act defines an Aghadi as a group of persons who have formed themselves into a party to set up candidates for election to a local authority. The Municipalities Act is structured to provide a uniform pattern of administration and powers for Municipalities. Section 63 of the Municipalities Act falls under Chapter 3, which deals with the election and removal of the President and Vice President and their governing functions. Each Subject Committee of the Council consists of such number of councillors as the Council may determine. The Collector calls a special meeting of the Council to determine the number of members for each of the Subject Committees. In nominating the councillors, the Collector considers the relative strength of recognised parties or registered parties. It will be appropriate to reproduce the second Proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Municipalities Act at this stage.
Provided further that, for the purpose of deciding the relative strength of the recognised parties or registered parties or groups under this sub-section, the recognised parties or registered parties or groups, or elected Councillor not belonging to any such party or group may, notwithstanding anything contained in the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986, within a period of not more than one month from the date of notification of election results, form the Aghadi or front and, on its registration, the provisions of the said Act shall apply to the members of such Aghadi or front, as if it is a pre-poll Aghadi or front.
(emphasis supplied)
Thus, to decide the relative strength of the recognised parties or registered parties or groups, these parties or groups, or an elected councillor not belonging to any such party or group, may form an Aghadi or Front within one month from the notification of the election results. Upon its registration, the provisions of the said Disqualification Act shall apply to the members of such an Aghadi or Front as if it were a pre-poll Aghadi or Front. The interpretation of the phase
Badshah v. Urmila Badshah Godse
Bhavnagar University vs. Palitana Supar Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Builders’ Association of India vs. Union of India
Dattatraya Maruti Bawalekar v/s. Pandurang Dagadu Parte
Dilip s/o. Keshavrao Ingole v/s. Janardhan Biju Gonnade and Ors. (1991) Mh.LJ 986
East End Dwellings Co. Ld. v. Finsbury Borough Council, (1952) AC 109
Indian Chamber of Commerce v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Ittianam and Ors. Vs. Cherichi @ Padmini 2010(8) SCC 612
Jagdev Singh Sidhanti v. Pratap Singh Daulta
Jeevan Chandrabhan Idnani v/s. Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Bhavan
K.P. Verghese v/s. The Income Tax Officer, Ernakulam
Kanti Prasad Jayshanker Yagnik v. Purshottamdas Ranchhoddas Patel
Maganlal Chhaganlal (P) Ltd. v. Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay
Nandkishore Ganesh Joshi vs. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation
New Okhala Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) vs. Yunus and Ors.
Paramjeet Singh Patheja vs. ICDS Ltd. 2006(13) SCC 322
Ramesh Yeshwant Prabhoo v. Prabhakar Kashinath Kunte
Shah Faruq Shabir and Ors. vs. Govindrao Ramu Vasave and Ors.
State of Maharashtra vs. Laljit Shah
Umadevi Rajkumar Jeure and Ors. vs. District Collector
Union of India v. Raghubir Singh
Union of India v/s. M/s. Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd.
Abhiram Singh v/s. C.D. Commachen (dead) by Legal Representatives
Additional Commissioner of Income Tax v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers' Association
AI
A councillor elected as an independent candidate and part of a post-election Aghadi is governed by the Disqualification Act for all purposes, treated as a pre-poll Aghadi.
Disqualification under Section 12(h) of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act applies only to subsisting contracts, necessitating purposive interpretation to avoid absurd outcomes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the disqualifications prescribed under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act apply to both elected and nominated councillors, and the disq....
The removal of an elected official requires strict adherence to statutory provisions and principles of natural justice, ensuring due process in disqualification cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the submission of the validity certificate within the stipulated period under Section 51-1B of the Act 1965, and the applicability of Section ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.