Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S.KARNIK, SHARMILA U.DESHMUKH
Govindrao Shankarrao Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Co-operative Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reference due to conflicting deposit requirement decisions (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. guarantor challenges attachment without certificate contest (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. conflicting judgments on section 154(2a) scope (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. submissions favoring literal interpretation exclusion (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. statutory provisions mandate 50% deposit revisions (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. summaries of divergent prior interpretations (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. literal vs purposive interpretation principles (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. purposive construction suppresses delay mischief (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. endorses deposit for derivative actions (Para 29 , 30) |
| 10. cooperative constitutional principles autonomy (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 11. mandatory 50% deposit all recovery revisions (Para 37 , 38) |
JUDGMENT :
M. S. KARNIK, J.
1. These writ petitions have been placed before us to answer a reference made by learned Single Judge of this Court (Hon’ble R. V. More, J. as he then was) in Writ Petition No. 4118 of 2024, by order dated 28th April 2014. The reference arose upon the learned Single Judge noticing an irreconcilable conflict between the views expressed in the judgments
Revision challenging consequential actions to recovery certificate under MCS Act requires 50% dues deposit; purposive interpretation curbs delays, overrides literal reading defeating recovery object.
Compliance with the mandate of Sub-Section (2A) of Section 154 of the Act of 1960 is not necessary for deciding the application for condonation of delay, and the Revisional Authority may refuse to en....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between proceedings for condonation of delay and the entertainment of the revision itself under section 154(2-A) of the MCS Act.
High Court cannot in exercise of its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can direct the bank to positively consider the benefit of one time settlement to writ petitioner.
The court established that under the MCS Act, the issuance of recovery certificates involves a summary inquiry focused on the quantification of arrears, and that disputes requiring evidence must be a....
The court reaffirmed that the issuance of Recovery Certificates under Section 101 must follow mandatory procedures, including proper notice and adherence to statutory deposit requirements, vital for ....
The Court established that recovery proceedings under Section 154B-29 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act are distinct from disputes under Section 92, and thus the limitation period defined....
Jurisdiction of civil courts is barred in challenging cooperative society actions under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act without prior notice as required by law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
