VIKRAMAJIT SEN, T.S.THAKUR
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vikramajit Sen, J. —Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions. These Appeals raise a legal nodus of substantial public importance pertaining to Court’s territorial jurisdiction concerning criminal complaints filed under Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, ‘the NI Act’). This is amply adumbrated by the Orders dated 3.11.2009 in I.A.No.1 in CC 15974/2009 of the three- Judge Bench presided over by the then Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar and Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam which SLP is also concerned with the interpretation of Section 138 of the NI Act, and wherein the Bench after issuing notice on the petition directed that it be posted before the three-Judge Bench.
PRECEDENTS
2. The earliest and the most often quoted decision of this Court relevant to the present conundrum is K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan (1999) 7 SCC 510 wherein a two-Judge Bench has, inter alia, interpreted Section 138 of the NI Act to indicate that, “the offence under Section 138 can be completed only with the concatenation of a number of acts. Following are the acts which are components of the said offence:
(1) Drawing of th
Tribhovandas Haribhai Tamboli v. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal and others (1991) 3 SCC 442.
Kerala State Housing Board and Ors. v. Ramapriya Hotels (P) Ltd. and Ors. 1994 (5) SCC 672.
Kush Sahgal & Ors. v. M.C. Mitter & Ors. (2000) 4 SCC 526.
Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. S.U.T.N.I Sangam & Ors. (2009) 16 SCC 1-Relied.
K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan (1999) 7 SCC 510-Dissented.
Harman Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. National Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. (2009) 1 SCC 720-Assented.
Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd. (2001) 3 SCC 609;
Nishant Aggarwal v. Kailash Kumar Sharma (2013) 10 SCC 72;
FIL Industries Ltd. v. Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat (2014) 2 SCC 266 ;
Escorts Ltd. v. Rama Mukherjee (2014) 2 SCC 255;
MSR Leathers v. S. Palaniappan & Anr. (2013) 1 SCC 177-Referred.
Sadanandan Bhadran v. Madhavan Sunil Kumar (1998) 6 SCC 514-Since Overruled.
K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan (1999) 7 SCC 510
Harman Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. National Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. (2009) 1 SCC 720.
Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd. (2001) 3 SCC 609.
Mosaraf Hossain Khan v. Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd. (2006) 3 SCC 658.
Om Hemrajani v. State of U.P. (2005) 1 SCC 617.
Patel Roadways Limited, Bombay v. Prasad Trading Company
ONGC v. Utpal Kumar Basu (1994) 4 SCC 711.
East Asia Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Nav Bharat Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (1996) 3 SCC 443.
Navinchandra N. Majithia v. State of Maharashtra (2000) 7 SCC 640.
Frick India Ltd. v. Union of India (1990) 1 SCC 400.
Forage & Co. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (1999) 8 SCC 577-Relied.
C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed and Another
Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial Tax Officer
Dwarka Prasad v. Dwarka Das Saraf (1976) 1 SCC 128.
Sreenivasa General Traders & Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. (1983) 4 SCC 353.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.