2014 Supreme(Pat) 1089
R. M. DOSHIT, ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
Suresh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
(In LPA No. 88 of 2014)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate, Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent State:Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mrs. Mohini Kumari, AC to SC 2
For the Staff Selection Commission :Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr. S S Sundaram, Advocate
(In LPA No. 1002 of 2013)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Nageshwar Prasad Advocate, Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent State: Mr. Mehboob Ashraf, AC to SC 27
(In LPA No. 1007 of 2013)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Kundan Kumar Mishra, Advocate, Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent State: Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh
(In LPA No. 1026 of 2013)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent State: Mr. Amar Nath Dev, SC, Mr.Thakur Jai Singh, AC to SC 26 (In LPA No. 1064 of 2013)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s:Mr. Jawahar Pd. Karn, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Siddharth Prasad, Advocate
(In LPA No. 1097 of 2013)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s:Mr. Jawahar Prasad Karn, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, Advocate
(In LPA No. 1221 of 2013)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Kundan Kumar Mishra, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent/s:Mr. Ajit Kumar, SC 28, Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate
(In LPA No. 1358 of 2013)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate, Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent/s:Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. S S Sundaram, Advocate
(LPA No. 1402 of 2013)
For the Appellant/s :Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Ajay Kumar Srivastava, AC to SC 2
Judgment :
This group of Appeals preferred by the writ petitioners under clause 10 of the Letters Patent arise from a common judgment and order dated 7th May 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 12121 of 2012 and other writ petitions. The matter at dispute is the recruitment for 2058 posts of Junior Engineer (Civil) in Water Resources Department pursuant to the advertisement dated 29th November 2006 published by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’).
2. It appears that the State Government made recruitment for appointment to the posts of Junior Engineer (Civil)/(Mechanical) under the advertisement published on 26th May 2006 and 4th August 2006 on the basis of the qualifying marks obtained by the candidates in aggregate. Pursuant to the requisition made by the State Government, the Commission published the above referred advertisement on 29th November 2006, inter alia, for recruitment for 2058 posts of Junior Engineer (Civil). According to the said advertisement, for appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (Civil), the candidate must posses a Diploma in Civil Engineering or Rural Engineering from an institution recognize
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
