IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
Manoj Kumar Singh, S/o. Sri Raj Narayan Singh & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7963 of 2021
Decided On : 11-05-2022
Service Law – Appointment – [Bihar Engineering Education Service Rules, 2020 – Table-1 of Appendix-1] – Posts of Assistant Professors in Government Engineering Colleges – Policy decision taken by respondents to shortlist candidates for interview on the basis of written test, is neither contrary to statutory provisions nor violative of any of fundamental rights – Method of short-listing has been mentioned in advertisement though not in Rules – Said method is based on some rationale and objective basis – There is clear stipulation in advertisement itself that candidates will be shortlisted for interview on the basis of written examination – Any part of advertisement, which is contrary to statutory rules, has to give way to statutory prescription – n present case, statutory rule is silent and in that background, a conscious decision has been taken by State Government and selection body how to shortlist candidates for interview, which cannot be said to be unreasonable – No illegality in impugned prescription in advertisement. (Paras 19, 24, 25 and 28)
JUDGMENT :
The petitioners are applicants against Advertisements No. 51/2020, 52/2020 and 54/2020 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission (‘Commission’ for short) for filling up the posts of Assistant Professors in the Government Engineering Colleges in the subjects of Mechanical Engineering, Computer Science and Engineering and Chemistry, respectively. The said selection process is governed by the Bihar Engineering Education Service Rules, 2020. The petitioners have served as Assistant Professors for some time in different Government Engineering Colleges on contractual basis, as disclosed in paragraph 7 of the writ petition. It is not in dispute that the Rules extend weightage to the candidates working on contract basis on the post of Assistant Professor under Department of Science and Technology and possessing minimum eligibility criteria @ five marks per year (maximum 25 marks). The selection process is divided in four parts, namely: -
| (i) | Academic record and research performance | Weightage 20 marks |
| (ii) | Evaluation of domain knowledge and teaching skill through written examination (objective) | Weightage 40 marks |
| (iii) | Interview | Weightage 15 marks |
| (iv) | Assistant Professors working on contractual basis, as noted above. | Weightage maximum 25 marks |
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by Note 4 under paragraph 5 of the aforesaid advertisements issued by the Commission, which stipulates that the candidates shall be shortlisted for interview on the basis of the written examination. The said stipulation in Note 4 is under challenge in the present writ application on the ground that the same is in breach of the statutory rules.
3. Heard Mr. Kumar Kaushik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi, learned AAG-6 assisted by Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, learned AC for the respondent State and Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned Advocate, for the respondent Commission.
4. Counter affidavits and supplementary counter affidavits have been filed on behalf of the respondents.
5. The sole issue for determination in the present writ application is as to whether aforesaid Note 4 mentioned under paragraph 5 of the advertisement is violative of the provisions under the Rules.
6. The prescribed qualification for direct appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in the Bihar Engineering Education Service as laid down in Table-1 of Appendix-1 of the Rules is as under: -
No minimum experience is prescribed for the said post.
7. The weightage scheme for direct appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in Bihar Engineering Education Service has been prescribed in Table-2 of Appendix-1, which is as under:
| Cadre Post | Academic Record and Research Performance (weightage-20 marks) | Evaluation of Domain- knowledge and Teaching Skill through written examination (objective) (weightage 40 marks) | Interview (weightage 15 marks) | For Assistant Professor engaged on Contract Basis (weightage 25 marks) |
| Assistant Professor | (a) maximum (10% of percentage marks obtained in M.Tech/M.E/M.S/ M.Sc./M.A. in relevant branch/subject). | 10 (a) For Science and Humanities:- The syllabus of core Subject of National Eligibility Text (NET) conducted by University Grants Commission (UGC) will be applicable. |
| Weightage to candidates working on contract basis on the post of Assistant Professor under Department of Science and Technology and possessing minimum eligibility criteria @ 05 marks per year (maximum -25 marks) |
|
| (b) Maximum 05 (5 % of percentage marks obtained in B.Tech/B.E/B.S/B.Sc.(Engg.)/ B.Sc. (Hons)/B.A. (Hons). | (b) For Engineering steam-The |
B. Ramakichenin v. Union of India
Government of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Dilip Kumar
Amlan Jyoti Borooah v. State of Assam
The balance between the interests of fresh entrants and experienced candidates in the selection process is crucial in determining the validity of selection criteria.
Amended Rules of 1962 mandate that interview marks in public examinations cannot exceed 10% of total marks to ensure fair and transparent selection processes, reaffirming principles of constitutional....
(1) Appointment – Even if relevant rules permit competent authority to set benchmarks at different stages of recruitment process, same must be done at any time before relevant stage is reached.(2) Ap....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the selection based on interview alone is permissible, and there is no rule of thumb for the weightage of marks for interview, as it varies fr....
It clearly emerges that in the event the performance of ineligible candidates in the written examination, held on are taken into consideration in shortlisting the candidates for personality test/inte....
The court established that amendments to recruitment rules can change the selection process, and the discretion of the recruiting agency in determining the method of selection is upheld unless found ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.