Back
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA
Shailesh Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
The present appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of Letters Patent Appellate Jurisdiction of Patna High Court Rules, 1916 and is directed against order dated 19-9-2018 passed by learned Single Judge in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4044 of 2010, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition filed by the present appellant / original petitioner.
2. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Advocate for the appellant, Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, learned Advocate for the Respondent, Mr. Sunit Kumar, learned Advocate for the Magadh University, Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, learned Advocate for the PPU, Ms. Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 and Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, learned AC to AAG-13 for the State.
3. Learned Advocate for the appellant / original petitioner submits that Laliteshwar Prasad Shahi College, Patna (hereinafter referred as L.P. Shahi College) was established in the year 1980 and has been affiliated to Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. Thereafter on the basis of the performance, the said college has also been registered under the provisions of UGC Act making it entitled to financial assistance from UGC. After the affiliation was
The court established that financial aid eligibility for lecturers in minority institutions is contingent upon the date of their appointment relative to the policy decision of 09.12.1982, which restr....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to the pay scale of Rs. 2200-4000/- from the date of her appointment, the benefit of the Sixth Pay Commission,....
PTA-appointed Assistant Professor from reserved category meeting relaxed 50% Master's marks and eligibility test criteria entitled to Grant-in-Aid salary from appointment date; denial despite parity ....
Eligible PTA college teachers entitled to grant-in-aid salary despite NET/SLET lack post-dispensation; discriminatory denial while granting others violates Articles 14,16; rules persist without repea....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the claim of a vested right to grant is misplaced and contrary to the grant-in-aid code if the appellant was not appointed to a sanctioned pos....
The university has exclusive authority over faculty absorption and regularization based on commission recommendations, and previous government notifications remain valid.
Ad hoc service should be considered for financial benefits, including arrears of salary, as approved by the State Government.
Autonomous institutions receiving public funding must adhere to the principles of equality in pay, ensuring parity for similar job roles under constitutional mandates.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
