SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 115

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, PARTHA SARTHY
Ranjeet Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Resp. no. 14 : Mr. Shivendra
& 15 Kishore, Sr. Adv. (in 45)
For the Resp. nos. 9 : Dr. Anjani Pd.
& 10 Singh, CGC(in 136)
Resp. Nos. 11 and 12 : Ms. Sarita Bajaj,
(U.O.I.) CGC(in 302)
For the Respondents: M/s Amit Sibbal, Sr. Adv., Alka Singh, Sumit Kumar Singh, Abhiprav Singh, Shivam Singh, Kumar Vikram, Kumar Avinahs, Deepali Singh, Shatakshi Sahay, Ankur Vyas, Vinay Tripathi, Darpan Sachdeva(in 302, 315, 321, 323, 327, 355, 357, 358, 377, 383); Kumar Ravish(in 324).
For the State : M/s P.K. Shahi, Sr. Adv./AG, Kinkar Kumar, SC-9, Yogesh Kumar, AC to SC-9 (in 45, 47, 54, 65, 68, 86, 126, 136, 310, 311, 409, 416, 521).
For Patna Metro Rail C. :Mr. S. D Sanjay, Sr. Advocate Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Advocate Mr. Lokesh Kumar(in 45, 47, 54, 65, 68, 86, 126, 136, 302, 310, 311, 320, 321, 323, 324, 327, 409, 416, 521).
For the U.O.I : M/s Manoj Kumar Singh, CGC (in 45); Kanak Verma, CGC(in 86); Amarendra Nath Verma, Sr. Panel counsel, Mukesh Kumar, CGC(in 126); Kanak Verma, CGC(in 136); Kumar Gangesh Gunjan, CGC(in 320); Deepak Kumar, Sr. CGC, Arvind Kumar, CGC(in 327); Poonam Kr. Singh, CGC Ms. Priya(in 416).
For the ASI (U.O.I) : Mr. Awadhesh Kr. Pandey, Sr. CGC, Abhishek Kumar Verma(in 521).

Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ.—There are three set of appeal which are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The land owners have challenged the acquisition of their lands in Mauja Pahari and Ranipur for construction of Patna Metro Rail Yard on account of non-compliance of provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter called “the Act of 2013”) which was rejected by the learned Single Judge. However, with respect to quantum of compensation to be paid to the land owners, it has been directed that the un-revised MVR/Circle Rates be revisited first taking into consideration all relevant factors including the opinion of the experts, whereupon only the compensation amount to the land owners be refixed and paid on the basis of revised MVR/Circle Rates.

3. On the issue of rehabilitation and resettlement, the State Government and the Collector, Patna have been directed to consider the recommendation of the Expert Committee.

4. This part of the judgment has been challenged by the State of Bihar and Patna Metro Rail Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “PMRC”)

5. The introductory facts are as follows:—

After t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top