ASHUTOSH KUMAR, PARTHA SARTHY
Sanjeev Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ. – All the writ petitions have been heard together and are being disposed off by this common judgment.
2. In C.W.J.C. Nos. 313 of 2025; 72 of 2025; 193 of 2025; 428 of 2025; 4980 of 2025; and 4987 of 2025, the petitioners have challenged the validity of Rule 6(1) of Bihar Pharmacists Cadre Rules, 2014 (as amended) (hereinafter referred to as “impugned Rules of 2014”), in which, it has been stipulated that for appointment by direct recruitment to the basic category posts of Pharmacists, minimum educational qualification shall be Intermediate/10+2 (Science) and passing in all parts (Part-I, II & III) of Diploma in Pharmacy from the Institutions recognized by the Government and a certificate to that effect would be necessary, as being violative of and repugnant to the Pharmacy Practice Regulations, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “Regulations of 2015”) framed by the Pharmacy Council of India (hereinafter referred to as “PCI”) under Section 10 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, which, inter alia, provides that the basic qualification of Diploma in Pharmacy and Bachelor Degree in Pharmacy would be necessary for the profession of Pharmacists.
3. Rule 6(1) of the impugned Rules
V.K. Sood vs. Secretary, Civil Aviation
B.S. Vadera vs. Union of India
Union of India vs. Hemraj Singh Chauhan
Md. Hanif Qureshi vs. State of Bihar
Mahanth Moti Das vs. S.P. Shahi: AIR 1959 SC 942
B.R. Enterprises vs. State of U.P.
State of Bihar vs. Bihar Distillery Ltd.
Hamdard Dawakhana (Waqf) vs. Union of India
Nair Service Society vs. Dr. T. Beermasthan
K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India
Sodan Singh vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee
Shri R.K. Dalmia vs. Shri Justice S.R. Tendolkar
Chandrashekhar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand
State of Punjab vs. Davinder Singh
Pharmacy Council of India vs. Dr. S.K. Toshniwal Educational Trusts Vidarbha Institute of Pharmacy
(1) Appointment of Pharmacists – Prescription of eligibility criteria of 10+2 with Diploma in Pharmacy by State cannot be said to be arbitrary or irrational – Rule 6(1) is Constitutionally valid.(2) ....
Recruitment Rules cannot be at variance with the Regulations prescribed by the Pharmacy Council of India for essential qualifications for appointment as a Pharmacist.
It is clear that for maintaining standards of education in schools, NCTE is now specifically empowered to determine qualifications of persons for being recruited as teachers in schools or colleges.
The court upheld the constitutionality of recruitment rules limiting Junior Engineer positions to diploma holders, determining that excluding higher qualification holders does not violate constitutio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.