SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 548

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, PRASENJIT MANDAL
Ashok Kumar Todi – Appellant
Versus
Kishwar Jahan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:S.K. Kapoor, D.N. Mittra, Samit Talukdar, Sandipan Ganguly, Ayan Chakraborty, Ayan Bhattacharyya, Sourav Bhagat, Ms. Sanchari Chakraborty, Bhaskar Sen, Subrata Ghosh, Samit Talukdar, Anindya Mitra, Joydeep Kar, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Kalyan Bandyopadhyay, Ms. Chaitali Bhattacharyya, Rajdeep Majumder, Ms. Lipi Majumdar, Advocates.
For the Cross-Appellant:Samaraditya Pal, Ms. Vineeta Meharia, Debanjan Mandal, Sanjib Kumar Trivedi, Advocates.
For the Cross-appellant: Partha Sarathi Sengupta, Debanjan Mandal, Darvapriya Mukherjee, Sanjiv Kumar Trivedi.
For the Appellant:Abhrajit Mitra, Kishore Dutta, Debanjan Mandal, Sandip Dasgupta, Jishnu Chowdhury, Sabyasachi Banerjee, Sanjiv Kumar Trivedi, Advocates.
For the State-respondents:Balai Chandra Roy, Sandip Srimani, irthankar Ghosh, Rajdeep Biswas, Advocates.
For the CBI-Respondent:Farook Razack, Santanu Kumar Mitra, Advocates.

JUDGMENT:-

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.:

All these Mandamus Appeals were taken up together as in all these appeals, the different appellants have challenged the selfsame order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which His Lordship allowed a writ application in which prayer was made for a direction that the criminal investigation involved in the writ-application should be conducted by CBI and not by CID as per direction of the government.

Being dissatisfied with the aforesaid direction given by the learned Single Judge along with some other findings, all these appeals have been preferred by not only the different respondents of the writ-application but also the writ petitioners whose grievance is that the learned Single Judge in addition to the aforesaid directions ought to have passed directions for initiating criminal proceedings against the respondents in the writ-petition in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Sm. Lata Singh vs. State of U.P and another reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522.

The respondent Nos.1 and 2 of these appeals (except MAT No.713 of 2008) filed a writ-application before a learned Single Judge of this Court thereby praying f












































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top