Back
SHEKHAR B. SARAF
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Chandra Pramanik – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
1. The present review petition by the State of West Bengal (hereinafter referred to as the “applicant”) arises from the order dated March 12, 2019 passed by Justice Protik Prakash Banerjee in W.P. No. 30178 (W) of 2014.
2. The factual matrix of the present case is laid down below:
(b) The Finance Department, Government of West Bengal published a Memorandum being No. 8305-F dated September 25, 2005 stating that the state government has been following the policy wherein the employees who were initially recruit
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's interpretation of the power of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to reach injustice wherever it is found an....
A review petition must demonstrate an error apparent on the face of the record; mere dissatisfaction with a decision does not warrant a review.
Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors manifest on the face of the record or considering newly discovered evidence. It cannot be used as an appeal in disguise to re-argue merits or corre....
Review jurisdiction cannot be exercised to rehear a case or correct an erroneous decision without evidence of an error apparent on the face of the record.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
